Leeks v. State

3 Citing cases

  1. Wynn v. State

    811 S.E.2d 53 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018)   Cited 4 times

    See supra note 11 & accompanying text.See, e.g. , In the Interest of E. W ., 290 Ga. App. 95, 97-98 (3), 658 S.E.2d 854 (2008) (holding that victim’s testimony as to a repair quote that he was given by an unidentified person was insufficient to establish the fair market value of the damage to a car, as the State presented no evidence of the fair market value of the car before and after the damage occurred); Leeks v. State , 281 Ga. App. 274, 275 (2), 635 S.E.2d 878 (2006) (noting that a repair estimate that the defendant relied on to establish a conflict in the evidence was inadmissible hearsay); In the Interest of A. F ., 236 Ga. App. 60, 60-61 (1), 510 S.E.2d 910 (1999) (holding that the victim’s testimony as to an estimate she was given for the cost to repair a damaged van was inadmissible hearsay, which was insufficient to prove the value required to support a conviction for criminal damage to property in the second degree); Cardwell v. State , 225 Ga. App. 337, 338, 484 S.E.2d 38 (1997) (holding that an estimated cost of repairs to the victim’s truck and the original purchase price of a damaged CD player obtained from an electronics store employee, not only did not establish the fair market value of the items, but was also inadmissible hearsay). Cf. Barnes v. State , 239 Ga. App. 495, 498-99 (1) (a), 521 S.E.2d 425 (1999) (holding that there was sufficient evidence as to the fair market value of a damaged dresser when th

  2. Elsasser v. State

    313 Ga. App. 661 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012)   Cited 4 times

    Because there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict, the trial court did not err in denying the motion for a directed verdict of acquittal. See Leeks v. State, 281 Ga.App. 274, 275(1), 635 S.E.2d 878 (2006) (sufficient evidence that damage to car exceeded $500 where victim testified cost of repairs was $946.74). Compare Johnson v. State, 156 Ga.App. 411, 412–413(2), 274 S.E.2d 778 (1980) (truck owner's opinion of the cost to replace broken windows insufficient where he had not obtained an estimate of the actual repair cost). 2.

  3. Elsasser v. State

    A11A1774 (Ga. Ct. App. Dec. 8, 2011)

    Because there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict, the trial court did not err in denying the motion for a directed verdict of acquittal. See Leeks v. State, 281 Ga. App. 274, 275 (1) ( 635 SE2d 878) (2006) (sufficient evidence that damage to car exceeded $500 where victim testified cost of repairs was $946.74). Compare Johnson v. State, 156 Ga. App. 411, 412-413 (2) ( 274 SE2d 778) (1980) (truck owner's opinion of the cost to replace broken windows insufficient where he had not obtained an estimate of the actual repair cost). 2.