From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Wiley

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 14, 2014
121 A.D.3d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-10-14

In re James D. LEE, Petitioner, v. Hon. Maxwell WILEY, etc., et al., Respondents.

James D. Lee, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Michelle R. Lambert of counsel), for Hon. Maxwell Wiley, respondent.


James D. Lee, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Michelle R. Lambert of counsel), for Hon. Maxwell Wiley, respondent.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Ryan Gee of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., respondent.

TOM, J.P., SWEENY, RENWICK, ANDRIAS, CLARK, JJ.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.


Summaries of

Lee v. Wiley

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 14, 2014
121 A.D.3d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Lee v. Wiley

Case Details

Full title:In re James D. LEE, Petitioner, v. Hon. Maxwell WILEY, etc., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 14, 2014

Citations

121 A.D.3d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 6926
995 N.Y.S.2d 533