Lee v. Wiley

Full title: In re James D. Lee, Petitioner, v. Hon. Maxwell Wiley, etc., et al.…

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 14, 2014

2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 6926 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

13227 1916/14 -4274

10-14-2014

In re James D. Lee, Petitioner, v. Hon. Maxwell Wiley, etc., et al., Respondents.

James D. Lee, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Michelle R. Lambert of counsel), for Hon. Maxwell Wiley, respondent. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Ryan Gee of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., respondent.

Tom, J.P.

, Sweeny, Renwick, Andrias, Clark, JJ.

James D. Lee, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Michelle R. Lambert of counsel), for Hon. Maxwell Wiley, respondent.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Ryan Gee of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: OCTOBER 14, 2014

CLERK