From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Wagner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 26, 2012
CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00802-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00802-BAM PC

01-26-2012

BOBBY LEE, Plaintiff, v. DR. WAGNER, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY


(ECF No. 69)

Plaintiff Bobby Lee ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's second amended complaint, filed June 1, 2009, against Defendant Wagner for deliberate indifference to medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On January 24, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion to stay this action and refer the parties for settlement negotiations.

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorize settlement discussions at any pretrial conference. Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(c)(9). While federal courts have the authority to require the parties to engage in settlement conferences, they have no authority to coerce settlements. Goss Graphic Systems, Inc. v. DEV Industries, Inc., 267 F.3d 624, 627 (7th Cir. 2001.) Defendant has not indicated to the Court that he is willing to participate in a settlement conference. No settlement conference will be scheduled until such time as both parties agree to participate in one. Plaintiff is advised that this order does not preclude the parties from discussing settlement.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to stay this action and refer for settlement is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Lee v. Wagner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 26, 2012
CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00802-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Lee v. Wagner

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY LEE, Plaintiff, v. DR. WAGNER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 26, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00802-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)