From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Sapp

COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
Mar 5, 2015
NO. 2014-CA-1047 (La. Ct. App. Mar. 5, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 2014-CA-1047

03-05-2015

RODERICK F. LEE v. THOMAS D. SAPP, STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES N.A., L.L.C. AND FINANCIAL SERVICES VEHICLE TRUST, INC.


LANDRIEU, J., CONCURS WITH REASONS

I agree with the result reached by the majority. However, I would pretermit deciding the choice of law issue. As noted by the majority, there is no substantive difference between Florida and Louisiana law as applied to these facts. Moreover, our disposition of the appeal is based upon the policy language, which is the law between the parties, rather than upon the application of state law. For these reasons, I respectfully concur.


Summaries of

Lee v. Sapp

COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
Mar 5, 2015
NO. 2014-CA-1047 (La. Ct. App. Mar. 5, 2015)
Case details for

Lee v. Sapp

Case Details

Full title:RODERICK F. LEE v. THOMAS D. SAPP, STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Mar 5, 2015

Citations

NO. 2014-CA-1047 (La. Ct. App. Mar. 5, 2015)