From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 2, 1998
777 So. 2d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-2309

Opinion dated December 2, 1998. JULY TERM, A.D. 1998

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Leslie B. Rothenberg, Judge. L.T. No. 96-18013.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Kenneth P. Speiller, Special Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Barbara A. Zappi, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SHEVIN and SORONDO, JJ.


We affirm defendant's convictions. See Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 (1990); United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 (1974); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986). Additionally, we reject the state's contention that the defendant's aggravated battery judgment of conviction is incorrect. See Dozier v. State, 677 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

However, we remand the cause to the trial court to clarify defendant's sentence because the court's oral pronouncements are unclear as to whether it intended to sentence defendant as an habitual offender on count I only, or on all counts. See Hampton v. State, 711 So.2d 200 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

Convictions affirmed; cause remanded to clarify sentence.


Summaries of

Lee v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 2, 1998
777 So. 2d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Lee v. State

Case Details

Full title:KEITH BERNARD LEE, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 2, 1998

Citations

777 So. 2d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Nelson v. State

We remand this cause to the trial court for clarification as to whether the court intended to sentence…