From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Nov 12, 2019
589 S.W.3d 658 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. ED 107282

11-12-2019

Anthony Jamal LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Mary S. Choi, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant. Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Mo. 65102, for respondent.


Mary S. Choi, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant.

Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Mo. 65102, for respondent.

Before Mary K. Hoff, P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The movant, Anthony Jamal Lee, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).


Summaries of

Lee v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Nov 12, 2019
589 S.W.3d 658 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Lee v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anthony Jamal LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Nov 12, 2019

Citations

589 S.W.3d 658 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)