From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Sierad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 16, 1990
157 A.D.2d 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

January 16, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Delaney, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and the plaintiffs' motion is granted on the condition that their attorneys personally pay $1,000 to the defendants within 20 days after service upon him of a copy of this decision and order with notice of entry; in the event that the condition is not complied with, the order is affirmed, with costs.

We conclude that the plaintiffs' motion to restore their action to the Trial Calendar should have been granted since the plaintiffs have demonstrated the existence of a meritorious cause of action and the absence of undue prejudice to the defendants. However, in view of the lapse of one year between the time the action was stricken from the Trial Calendar and the making of the motion to restore the case to the calendar, and the fact that the delay in moving to restore the case to the calendar was caused exclusively by the plaintiffs' counsel, we deem it appropriate to impose the sanction indicated above as a condition to restoring the action to the calendar (see, Simon v. Avis Rent-A-Car, 127 A.D.2d 583; Sheehan v. Hollywood, 112 A.D.2d 211; Dunnsinnae Woods Homes v. Allstate Ins. Co., 100 A.D.2d 533). Mollen, P.J., Brown, Eiber and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lee v. Sierad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 16, 1990
157 A.D.2d 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Lee v. Sierad

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN J. LEE et al., Appellants, v. MARK SIERAD et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 16, 1990

Citations

157 A.D.2d 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
549 N.Y.S.2d 807