From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. McDonald

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 3, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-CV-60238-AA (E.D. Mich. Mar. 3, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-CV-60238-AA.

March 3, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on several post-judgment motions filed by Plaintiff. (Docket nos. 89, 90, 93, 94, 95). In addition, Defendant has moved to strike the first two of these motions. (Docket no. 92). All of these motions were filed after the Court entered a Consent Judgment in this matter on July 5, 2007. (Docket no. 78). Plaintiff's motions are not post-judgment motions allowed under the Federal Rules. Even if they were construed as such motions, they are frivolous. After Plaintiff filed all of these motions he requested that this Court order the settlement proceeds of the case be dispersed to him, and this Court entered an Order dispersing the funds on February 12, 2008. (Docket nos. 96, 97). Therefore, the case is settled, and Plaintiff has received the settlement proceeds.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's post-judgment motions (docket nos. 89, 90, 93, 94, and 95) are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's post-judgment Motion to Strike (docket no. 92) is GRANTED.

NOTICE TO PARTIES

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a), the parties have a period of ten days from the date of this Order within which to file any written appeal to the District Judge as may be permissible under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).


Summaries of

Lee v. McDonald

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 3, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-CV-60238-AA (E.D. Mich. Mar. 3, 2008)
Case details for

Lee v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT E. LEE, Plaintiff, v. KARLA McDONALD, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Mar 3, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-CV-60238-AA (E.D. Mich. Mar. 3, 2008)