From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Landis

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 28, 2021
8:21-cv-01555-CJC-JDE (C.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)

Opinion

8:21-cv-01555-CJC-JDE

12-28-2021

Yeong Lee v. William Landis et al.


PRESENT: HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Plaintiffs are responsible for prosecuting their actions diligently and complying with Court orders. The Court's Order Regarding Prosecution of Certain Cases Under the Americans with Disabilities Act states that "[p]roofs of service for all defendants must be filed within 95 days of the filing of the case absent a previously approved extension of time by the Court or a motion or responsive pleading by all defendants." (Dkt. 9 [hereinafter the "Order"] at 2 [emphases in original].) The Order further admonishes that "failure to comply with this Order in a particular case will result in a dismissal for lack of prosecution." (Id. at 3.)

Plaintiff filed this case on September 22, 2021. Although more than 95 days have passed since that date, Plaintiff has not filed a proof of service on any defendant. The Court therefore DISMISSES this action for lack of prosecution.


Summaries of

Lee v. Landis

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 28, 2021
8:21-cv-01555-CJC-JDE (C.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Lee v. Landis

Case Details

Full title:Yeong Lee v. William Landis et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 28, 2021

Citations

8:21-cv-01555-CJC-JDE (C.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)