Opinion
2002-01360
Argued May 30, 2003.
August 11, 2003.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated October 30, 2001, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on their cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 240(1).
Edward H. Suh and Associates, P.C., Flushing, N.Y. (Anthony DeFazio of counsel), for appellants.
Barry, McTiernan Moore, New York, N.Y. (Laurel A. Wedinger and Anthony J. McNulty of counsel), for respondents.
Before: SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court correctly found that a question of fact exists as to whether the scaffold provided the injured plaintiff with proper protection (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320). Accordingly, the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment was properly denied.
FEUERSTEIN, J.P., SCHMIDT, MASTRO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.