Opinion
Civil Action No. 06-cv-02388-ZLW-BNB.
September 4, 2007
ORDER
The matter before the Court is Plaintiff's Objection To Recommendation Of Dismissal (Doc. No. 55). This objection was filed by Plaintiff pro se although she is represented by counsel. Parties represented by counsel may not file papers pro se. The Court notes this is the fourth time in this case that Plaintiff has been warned not to file papers pro se. Therefore, it is
"Every [paper] shall be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney's individual name. . . ." Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(a).
See Order (Doc. No. 26; Apr. 2, 2007); Order (Doc. No. 39; May 16, 2007); Order (Doc. No. 41; May 30, 2007).
ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objection To Recommendation Of Dismissal (Doc. No. 55; Aug. 29, 2007) is stricken. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's attorney may file an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. No. 54) on Plaintiff's behalf on or before September 18, 2007.