Lee v. Haizlip

2 Citing cases

  1. Ayers v. Coon

    146 P. 707 (Okla. 1915)   Cited 1 times

    Upon the offer of defendant in error to remit amounts recovered in excess of this, we are of the opinion that the order reversing this cause should be set aside and the judgment appealed from be modified and affirmed. Moore v. Calvert et al., 8 Okla. 358, 58 P. 627; Board of County Commissioners v. Smith, 18 Okla. 132, 89 P. 1121; Lee v. Haizlip, 22 Okla. 393, 99 P. 806, 1135; F. M. Ins. Co. v. Cuff, 29 Okla. 106, 116 P. 435, 35 L. R. A. (N. S.) 892; M., K. T. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 30 Okla. 754, 120 P. 1100; St. L. S. F. Ry. Co. v. Goode, 142 P. 1185. It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the trial court be modified and affirmed as to the item of $100 for attorney's fees and $25 for expenses and loss of time.

  2. Byrd v. Hammett

    27 Okla. 641 (Okla. 1910)

    The findings of fact by a referee have the same force and effect of a special verdict of a jury. Lee v. Haizlip, 22 Okla. 393; Shannon v. Petherbridge et al., 17 Okla. 507. Under the same practice, when a case has been referred to the referee and his findings of fact have been confirmed by the trial court, the same will not be disturbed on appeal when there is evidence in the record reasonably tending to support the same Seay v. Ellison et al., 25 Okla. 710, 107 P. 656.