From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Fulwood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jun 4, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-1895 (BAH) (D.D.C. Jun. 4, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-1895 (BAH)

06-04-2012

MARK ANTHONY LEE, Petitioner, v. ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. et al., Respondents.


MEMORANDUM

By Order of April 16, 2012, Petitioner was directed to respond by May 17, 2012, to the Government's opposition to his petition for a writ of habeas corpus or risk summary dismissal of the petition, ECF No. 9. Petitioner has neither filed a response nor moved for additional time to do so. He therefore has not opposed Respondents' documented reasons for denying the petition, see Gov't's Opp'n to Pet'r's Pet. for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 8, at 4-7, with which the Court agrees and adopts for the purpose of denying the petition. A separate final order accompanies this Memorandum.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lee v. Fulwood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jun 4, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-1895 (BAH) (D.D.C. Jun. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Lee v. Fulwood

Case Details

Full title:MARK ANTHONY LEE, Petitioner, v. ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Jun 4, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-1895 (BAH) (D.D.C. Jun. 4, 2012)