From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Field (In re Lee)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 7, 2018
No. 16-15108 (9th Cir. May. 7, 2018)

Opinion

No. 16-15108

05-07-2018

In re: ADAM LEE, Debtor, ADAM LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DANE S. FIELD, Trustee, Defendant-Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 1:15-cv-00472-SOM-BMK MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii
Susan O. Mollway, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 15, 2018 Honolulu, Hawaii Before: O'SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). --------

Chapter 7 debtor Adam Lee appeals the district court's order dismissing as moot Lee's appeal from the bankruptcy court's order approving a sale of real property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(1).

Lee concedes that, because he did not obtain a stay of the sale order, 11 U.S.C. § 363(m) bars him from undoing the sale in this appeal. See In re Onouli-Kona Land Co., 846 F.2d 1170, 1171 (9th Cir. 1988). No exception to the § 363(m) mootness rule is applicable in this context. See In re Filtercorp, Inc., 163 F.3d 570, 576-77 (9th Cir. 1998).

We decline to exercise our discretion to grant the trustee's request that we impose sanctions on Lee.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Lee v. Field (In re Lee)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 7, 2018
No. 16-15108 (9th Cir. May. 7, 2018)
Case details for

Lee v. Field (In re Lee)

Case Details

Full title:In re: ADAM LEE, Debtor, ADAM LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DANE S. FIELD…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 7, 2018

Citations

No. 16-15108 (9th Cir. May. 7, 2018)