Opinion
June 6, 1988
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing, separately and filing separate briefs.
The plaintiffs failed to establish a reasonable excuse for their defaults (see, La Buda v Brookhaven Mem. Hosp. Med. Center, 98 A.D.2d 711, affd on other grounds 62 N.Y.2d 1014). Accordingly, those branches of the plaintiffs' motion which were to vacate their defaults were properly denied.
Further, the cross motion of the defendants Enoch Star Restoration Fund Development Co., Inc. and Willard Price Housing for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against them was properly granted (see, Turbowitz v Mapeth, Inc., 140 A.D.2d 433). Bracken, J.P., Brown, Lawrence and Spatt, JJ., concur.