From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Datax, Ltd

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 18, 2022
2:22-cv-01209-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 18, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01209-NJK

08-18-2022

BRYAN LEE, Plaintiff, v. DATAX, LTD, Defendant.

CLARK HILL PLLC GIA N. MARINA Attorney for Defendant DataX, Ltd. David H. Krieger, Esq. Shawn Miller, Esq. KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff


CLARK HILL PLLC GIA N. MARINA Attorney for Defendant DataX, Ltd.

David H. Krieger, Esq. Shawn Miller, Esq. KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DDATAX, LTD TO FILE ANSWER

FIRST REQUEST

Defendant DataX, Ltd (“DataX”) has requested an extension of time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this matter, to which Plaintiff has no opposition. Accordingly, pursuant to LR IA 6-2, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED to by and among counsel, that DataX's time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action is extended from August 19, 2022 through and including September 19, 2022. The request was made by DataX so that it can have an opportunity to collect and review its internal files pertaining to the allegations in the Complaint, and Plaintiff approves. This stipulation is filed in good faith and not intended to cause delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Lee v. Datax, Ltd

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 18, 2022
2:22-cv-01209-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Lee v. Datax, Ltd

Case Details

Full title:BRYAN LEE, Plaintiff, v. DATAX, LTD, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 18, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01209-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 18, 2022)