From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 12, 2024
No. 9598-22 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 12, 2024)

Opinion

9598-22

01-12-2024

JIMMY D. LEE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge

On January 10, 2024, the parties filed a Proposed Stipulated Decision. However, the proposed decision document does not contain a proper signature block below the signature of respondent's counsel. Rule 23(a)(4) of the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure directs that a proposed decision document must omit a party's mailing address, email address, and telephone number. Here, the Court notes that respondent's counsel has included this information.

That being so, it is

ORDERED that the parties' Proposed Stipulated Decision is deemed stricken from the Court's record in this case. It is further ORDERED that, on or before February 5, 2024, the parties shall file a revised Proposed Stipulated Decision.


Summaries of

Lee v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 12, 2024
No. 9598-22 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 12, 2024)
Case details for

Lee v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY D. LEE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jan 12, 2024

Citations

No. 9598-22 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 12, 2024)