From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Clark

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 25, 2008
266 F. App'x 295 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-1702.

Submitted: February 21, 2008.

Decided: February 25, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:05-cv-00897-WDQ).

Reginald Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Stakem Hornig, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Patrick Donald Sheridan, William Rowe Phelan, Jr., Baltimore Police Department, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Reginald Lee appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lee v. Clark, No. 1:05-cv-00897-WDQ (D. Md. June 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Lee v. Clark

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 25, 2008
266 F. App'x 295 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Lee v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:Reginald LEE, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. Kevin CLARK; John Doe, Jr.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 25, 2008

Citations

266 F. App'x 295 (4th Cir. 2008)