Lee v. City of Los Angeles

Full title: BRENDA LEE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al.…

Court: California Court of Appeals, Second District, Second Division

Date published: Mar 16, 2010

No. B202865 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 16, 2010)

Opinion

BRENDA LEE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Appellants. B202865 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Second Division March 16, 2010

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC336783

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING

THE COURT: ^*

* BOREN, P. J. ASHMANN-GERST, J. CHAVEZ, J.

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on February 18, 2010, be modified as follows:

On page 23, second sentence of the first full paragraph, the words “damages from” are inserted after the words “evidence of” so the sentence reads:

“The trial court’s denial of the city’s motions in limine seeking to exclude evidence of damages from these incidents was contrary to established law and constituted an abuse of discretion.”

There is no change in the judgment.

Respondent’s petition for rehearing is denied.