From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. AP Am. Tire Depot, Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 7, 2024
8:24-cv-00592-CJC-KES (C.D. Cal. May. 7, 2024)

Opinion

8:24-cv-00592-CJC-KES

05-07-2024

John Lee v. AP American Tire Depot, Inc. et al


PRESENT: HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

It is a plaintiff's responsibility to prosecute the action diligently and respond promptly to Court orders. The Court's Order Regarding Prosecution of Certain Cases Under the Americans with Disabilities Act states that “a request for default must be filed no later than 5 days after the time the response to the complaint would have been due.” (Dkt. 8 [hereinafter the “Order”] at 2 [emphasis in original].) The Order further admonishes that “failure to comply with this Order in a particular case will result in a dismissal for lack of prosecution.” (Id. at 3.)

In this case, Plaintiff served Defendants on April 9, 2024. (Dkt. 13.) Defendants' answer was therefore due on or before April 30, 2024. (Id.) Although more than 5 days have passed since that date, Defendants have not responded to the Complaint and Plaintiff has not filed a request for default. The Court therefore DISMISSES this action for lack of prosecution.


Summaries of

Lee v. AP Am. Tire Depot, Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 7, 2024
8:24-cv-00592-CJC-KES (C.D. Cal. May. 7, 2024)
Case details for

Lee v. AP Am. Tire Depot, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:John Lee v. AP American Tire Depot, Inc. et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 7, 2024

Citations

8:24-cv-00592-CJC-KES (C.D. Cal. May. 7, 2024)