From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Amrest, LLC

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division
Nov 9, 2010
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-770-MEF-CSC (M.D. Ala. Nov. 9, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-770-MEF-CSC.

November 9, 2010


ORDER


This Court has reviewed the parties' Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting filed on November 8, 2010. The parties have reported two areas of dispute as to discoveryrelated issues, which have yet to be resolved. Specifically, the parties have not reached an agreement on the following: (1) the maximum number of requests for production of documents; and (2) the deadline for supplementation of disclosures and responses under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(e).

It is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the matter is hereby referred to United States Magistrate Judge Charles S. Coody to assist in the resolution of these issues of discovery, and entry of any orders or recommendations as may be appropriate.

DONE this the 9th day of November, 2010.


Summaries of

Lee v. Amrest, LLC

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division
Nov 9, 2010
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-770-MEF-CSC (M.D. Ala. Nov. 9, 2010)
Case details for

Lee v. Amrest, LLC

Case Details

Full title:MARICUS LEE Plaintiff, v. AMREST, LLC, d/b/a APPLEBEE'S, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division

Date published: Nov 9, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-770-MEF-CSC (M.D. Ala. Nov. 9, 2010)