From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Allen

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Oct 17, 2018
165 A.D.3d 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

2018–01895 Index No. 65723/15E

10-17-2018

Dana LEE, etc., respondent, v. Gloria ALLEN, et al., appellants.

Law Office of David S. Klausner PLLC, White Plains, N.Y. (Stephen Slater of counsel), for appellants. O'Connor Redd LLP, Port Chester, N.Y. (Kevin Page of counsel), for respondent.


Law Office of David S. Klausner PLLC, White Plains, N.Y. (Stephen Slater of counsel), for appellants.

O'Connor Redd LLP, Port Chester, N.Y. (Kevin Page of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., COLLEEN D. DUFFY, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicholas Colabella, J.H.O.), dated January 18, 2018. The order granted the plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 3025 for leave to amend the complaint and bill of particulars to add a demand for punitive damages.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint and bill of particulars to add a demand for punitive damages, as there was no prejudice or surprise to the defendants and the proposed amendment was not palpably insufficient or devoid of merit (see CPLR 3025[b] ; Postiglione v. Castro, 119 A.D.3d 920, 922, 990 N.Y.S.2d 257 ). Although the plaintiff unsuccessfully moved for the same relief in a prior motion, "[t]he doctrine of the law of the case does not bind appellate courts, and thus, this Court is not bound by the law of the case established by the prior determination" ( Hothan v. Mercy Med. Ctr., 105 A.D.3d 905, 905, 963 N.Y.S.2d 322 ).

DILLON, J.P., DUFFY, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lee v. Allen

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Oct 17, 2018
165 A.D.3d 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Lee v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:Dana Lee, respondent, v. Gloria Allen, et al., appellants.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Oct 17, 2018

Citations

165 A.D.3d 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 6890
83 N.Y.S.3d 916

Citing Cases

Seabring, LLC v. Elegance Rest. Furniture Corp.

Here, the Referee determined that the plaintiff was entitled to recover damages for "use and occupancy" for…

Rubin v. Poly Prep Country Day Sch.

Furthermore, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the…