Opinion
8:24-cv-00306-CJC-JDE
05-13-2024
PRESENT: HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
It is a plaintiff's responsibility to prosecute the action diligently and respond promptly to Court orders. The Court's Order Regarding Prosecution of Certain Cases Under the Americans with Disabilities Act states that “a request for default must be filed no later than 5 days after the time the response to the complaint would have been due.” (Dkt. 9 [hereinafter the “Order”] at 2 [emphasis in original].) The Order further admonishes that “failure to comply with this Order in a particular case will result in a dismissal for lack of prosecution.” (Id. at 3.)
In this case, Plaintiff served Defendant on March 13, 2024. (Dkt. 13.) Defendant's answer was therefore due on or before April 3, 2024. (Id.) Then, a stipulation extending time to answer was filed. Defendant's answer was therefore due on or before May 3, 2024. Although more than 5 days have passed since that date, Defendant has not responded to the Complaint and Plaintiff has not filed a request for default. The Court therefore DISMISSES this action for lack of prosecution.