From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ledwell v. Kenworthy

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Oct 11, 2006
1:05CV00951 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 11, 2006)

Opinion

1:05CV00951.

October 11, 2006


ORDER


On August 24, 2006, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Petitioner filed objections to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636.

The Court has reviewed petitioner's objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's rulings which are affirmed and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion to amend his petition (docket no. 20) is denied, that respondent's motion for summary judgment (docket no. 8) is granted, that the habeas petition (docket no. 2) is denied, that this action is dismissed, and that finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is denied.


Summaries of

Ledwell v. Kenworthy

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Oct 11, 2006
1:05CV00951 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 11, 2006)
Case details for

Ledwell v. Kenworthy

Case Details

Full title:BILLY GENE LEDWELL, Petitioner, v. GEORGE KENWORTHY, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Oct 11, 2006

Citations

1:05CV00951 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 11, 2006)