Opinion
No. A13A0137.
2013-05-16
LEDFORD v. MOBLEY.
Thomas F. Jones, Atlanta, for appellant. Fryer, Shuster & Lester, William R. Lester, Atlanta, for appellee.
Thomas F. Jones, Atlanta, for appellant. Fryer, Shuster & Lester, William R. Lester, Atlanta, for appellee.
RAY, Judge.
John W. Ledford appeals the trial court's award of attorney fees pursuant to OCGA § 9–15–14 to Dennis L. Mobley and R & D Trucking and Transport Services, Inc. Because we lack jurisdiction, this case is dismissed.
“It is incumbent upon this Court to inquire into its own jurisdiction.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) American Mgmt. Svcs. East v. Fort Benning Family Communities, 318 Ga.App. 827, 828(1), 734 S.E.2d 833 (2012). Here, Ledford filed a direct appeal, where he should have filed a discretionary appeal.
OCGA § 5–6–35(a)(10) provides that “[a]ppeals from awards of attorney's fees or expenses of litigation under Code Section 9–15–14” shall, pursuant to OCGA § 5–6–35(b), “be by application in the nature of a petition enumerating the errors to be urged on appeal and stating why the appellate court has jurisdiction.”
It is well settled that the underlying subject matter of an appeal generally controls in determining the proper appellate procedure. Rebich v. Miles, 264 Ga. 467, 467–468, 448 S.E.2d 192 (1994). Here, an examination of the appellate brief shows enumerations of error addressing only the trial court's award of attorney fees, which were uncontested below. No enumerations of error relate to other portions of the judgment. “[A]n application for appeal is required when ‘the underlying subject matter’ of the appeal is listed in OCGA § 5–6–35(a), even though the party may be appealing a judgment or order that is procedurally subject to a direct appeal under OCGA § 5–6–34(a).” (Citation omitted.) Avren v. Garten, 289 Ga. 186, 192(7), 710 S.E.2d 130 (2011), citing Rebich, supra. Because the underlying subject matter of this appeal—the award of attorney fees pursuant to OCGA § 9–15–14—is listed in OCGA § 5–6–35(a)(10), Ledford was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. Capricorn Systems v. Godavarthy, 253 Ga.App. 840, 841, 560 S.E.2d 730 (2002) (discretionary appeal procedure applied where appellant claimed error as to attorney fees award and made no claims of error as to other, directly appealable issues). Although this Court has found an award of attorney fees under OCGA § 9–14–15 directly appealable, it has done so only in instances where, unlike in the instant case, the attorney fees were appealed along with other, directly appealable matters. See Murray v. DeKalb Farmers Market, 305 Ga.App. 523, 524, 699 S.E.2d 842 (2010); Stancil v. Gwinnett County, 259 Ga. 507, 508, 384 S.E.2d 666 (1989); Haggard v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. System of Ga., 257 Ga. 524, 526(4)(a), 360 S.E.2d 566 (1987). These cases do not control here, and we lack jurisdiction.
Appeal dismissed.