From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ledbetter v. Shelby Cnty. Jail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 23, 2017
No. 17-2122-JDT-cgc (W.D. Tenn. Feb. 23, 2017)

Opinion

No. 17-2122-JDT-cgc

02-23-2017

KENNDRICK LEDBETTER, Plaintiff, v. SHELBY COUNTY JAIL, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO COMPLY WITH 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(1)-(2) OR PAY THE ENTIRE $400 CIVIL FILING FEE

On February 13, 2017, Plaintiff Kenndrick Ledbetter, booking number 13146668, an inmate at the Shelby County Criminal Justice Complex ("Jail") in Memphis, Tennessee, filed two pro se letters accompanied by copies of grievances and responses from the Jail. (ECF No. 1.) The Court has construed these documents as a complaint for violation of his civil rights, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff did not pay the $400 civil filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of his inmate trust account for the last six months, as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)-(b).

"Pro se complaints are to be held 'to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers,' and should therefore be liberally construed." Williams, 631 F.3d at 383 (quoting Martin v. Overton, 391 F.3d 710, 712 (6th Cir. 2004)). Pro se litigants, however, are not exempt from the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App'x 608, 612, 613 (6th Cir. Jan. 31, 2011) (affirming dismissal of pro se complaint for failure to comply with "unique pleading requirements" and stating "a court cannot 'create a claim which [a plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleading'" (quoting Clark v. Nat'l Travelers Life Ins. Co., 518 F.2d 1167, 1169 (6th Cir. 1975))); Payne v. Sec'y of Treas., 73 F. App'x 836, 837 (6th Cir. 2003) (affirming sua sponte dismissal of complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) and stating, "[n]either this court nor the district court is required to create Payne's claim for her"); cf. Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 231 (2004) ("District judges have no obligation to act as counsel or paralegal to pro se litigants.").

In this case, Plaintiff asserts in his documents that his Eighth Amendment rights have been violated in various ways. (ECF No. 1 at 1.) However, he names no specific defendants and includes only very brief factual allegations regarding each claim. Thus, in their present form, Plaintiff's documents are inadequate to state any claim on which relief may be granted.

The Court has made an attempt to determine, from Plaintiff's documents, the entities and individuals he may have meant to sue. However, the documents contain no list of defendants; therefore, the Court cannot be certain of Plaintiff's intent.

Plaintiff is ORDERED to file an amended complaint within 30 days after the date of this order. The text of the amended complaint must identify each defendant sued, set forth the specific causes of action that are asserted against each defendant, and allege sufficient facts to support each of those claims. If Plaintiff fails to timely file an amended complaint the Court will dismiss the case without further notice for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Under the PLRA, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)-(b), a prisoner bringing a civil action must pay the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Although the obligation to pay the fee accrues at the moment the case is filed, see McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 605 (6th Cir. 1997), partially overruled on other grounds by LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013), the PLRA provides the prisoner the opportunity to make a "down payment" of a partial filing fee and pay the remainder in installments. Id. at 604. However, in order to take advantage of the installment procedures, the prisoner must properly complete and submit to the district court, along with the complaint, an in forma pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his trust account statement for the six months immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2).

As stated, Plaintiff has failed to pay the $400 filing fee or submit an in forma pauperis affidavit and trust account statement in accordance with the PLRA. Therefore, Plaintiff is also ORDERED to submit, within 30 days after the date of this order, either the entire $400 filing fee or a properly completed and executed application to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the last six months. The Clerk is directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of the prisoner in forma pauperis affidavit form along with this order.

If Plaintiff timely submits the necessary financial information and the Court finds he is indeed indigent, the Court will grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and assess a filing fee of $350 in accordance with the installment procedures of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). However, if Plaintiff fails to comply with this order in a timely manner, the Court will deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, assess the entire $400 filing fee from his inmate trust account without regard to the installment payment procedures, and dismiss the action without further notice for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). McGore, 114 F.3d at 605.

If Plaintiff needs additional time to submit either an amended complaint or his financial information, he may, within 30 days after the date of this order, file a motion for an extension of time. IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ James D. Todd

JAMES D. TODD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ledbetter v. Shelby Cnty. Jail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 23, 2017
No. 17-2122-JDT-cgc (W.D. Tenn. Feb. 23, 2017)
Case details for

Ledbetter v. Shelby Cnty. Jail

Case Details

Full title:KENNDRICK LEDBETTER, Plaintiff, v. SHELBY COUNTY JAIL, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 23, 2017

Citations

No. 17-2122-JDT-cgc (W.D. Tenn. Feb. 23, 2017)