From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ledbetter v. Mullis

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 3, 2024
No. A24A1663 (Ga. Ct. App. Jul. 3, 2024)

Opinion

A24A1663

07-03-2024

JESSICA LEDBETTER v. LISA MULLIS.


Harold J. Ledbetter filed suit against Lisa Mullis in superior court. Subsequently, non-party Jessica Ledbetter filed several motions in the action, including a motion to substitute herself as plaintiff on the grounds that Harold Ledbetter had died and she was his only biological heir. The superior court denied all of the motions and suspended further proceedings in the action pending the probate court's appointment of an executor for the estate. Jessica Ledbetter filed this direct appeal. Mullis has filed a motion to dismiss.

As a general rule, a right of direct appeal only lies from a final judgment - that is, where the case is no longer pending below. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1). Here, the trial court's order did not resolve all the issues in the case. Thus, Jessica Ledbetter was required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b) to obtain appellate review, and her failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal. See Underwood v. Dunn, 215 Ga.App. 252, 252 (451 S.E.2d 129) (1994).

Consequently, Mullis's motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Ledbetter v. Mullis

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 3, 2024
No. A24A1663 (Ga. Ct. App. Jul. 3, 2024)
Case details for

Ledbetter v. Mullis

Case Details

Full title:JESSICA LEDBETTER v. LISA MULLIS.

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jul 3, 2024

Citations

No. A24A1663 (Ga. Ct. App. Jul. 3, 2024)