From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LEDBETTER v. BECK

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Oct 10, 2007
1:06CV239 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 10, 2007)

Opinion

1:06CV239.

October 10, 2007


ORDER


On July 26, 2007, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff filed objections to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636, and Defendant Sami Hassan filed a response to the objections.

The Court has reviewed the parties' submissions de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's rulings which are affirmed and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants Dr. Pamela Love's and Dr. Sami Hassan's motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim (docket no. 17 23) are granted and that this action is dismissed as to these two defendants.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Theodis Beck, Secretary of the Department of Correction, Terry Harvel, Superintendent of the Randolph Correctional Institute, and Nurse Yuerlton are dismissed sua sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim for relief against these Defendants and, they being the remaining Defendants, this action be, and the same hereby is, dismissed.


Summaries of

LEDBETTER v. BECK

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Oct 10, 2007
1:06CV239 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 10, 2007)
Case details for

LEDBETTER v. BECK

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY E. LEDBETTER, Plaintiff, v. THEODIS BECK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Oct 10, 2007

Citations

1:06CV239 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 10, 2007)

Citing Cases

Ledbetter v. Beck

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by…