From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leclezio v. First American Title Ins. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 13, 2001
13 F. App'x 691 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion


13 Fed.Appx. 691 (9th Cir. 2001) Louis LECLEZIO; Wendy Leclezio, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 99-36190. D.C. No. CV-98-01198-TSZ. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 13, 2001

Argued and Submitted June 15, 2001.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Thomas S. Zilly, District Judge, Presiding.

Before B. FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Louis and Wendy Leclezio appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee First American Title Insurance Company on the Leclezios' state tort claims for slander of title, tortious interference, and conspiracy to defraud. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Balint v. Carson City, 180 F.3d 1047, 1050 (9th Cir.1999) (en banc). Upon thorough review of the record, and viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Leclezios, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment to First American because the Leclezios failed to provide evidence to support one or more essential elements of each of the intentional tort claims.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Leclezio v. First American Title Ins. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 13, 2001
13 F. App'x 691 (9th Cir. 2001)
Case details for

Leclezio v. First American Title Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Louis LECLEZIO; Wendy Leclezio, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. FIRST AMERICAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 13, 2001

Citations

13 F. App'x 691 (9th Cir. 2001)