From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leclair v. Palmetto Health

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Jul 2, 2014
Appellate Case No. 2013-001061 (S.C. Jul. 2, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-001061 Lower Court Case No. 2008-CP-40-4832 Memorandum Opinion No. 2014-MO-026

07-02-2014

Ruth Sturkie LeClair, as Next of Kin to and Personal Representative of the Estate of Raymond Conrad LeClair, Respondent, v. Palmetto Health, Petitioner.

James E. Parham, Jr., of James E. Parham, Jr., P.A., of Irmo, and Andrew F. Lindemann, of Davidson & Lindemann, PA, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Stephen R. Soltis, Jr., of Soltis Law Firm, of Lexington, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.


Appeal From Richland County

The Honorable Alison Renee Lee, Circuit Court Judge


REMANDED

James E. Parham, Jr., of James E. Parham, Jr., P.A., of Irmo, and Andrew F. Lindemann, of Davidson & Lindemann, PA, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Stephen R. Soltis, Jr., of Soltis Law Firm, of Lexington, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: This matter is before the Court by way of a petition for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' decision in LeClair v. Palmetto Health, 2013-UP-081 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Feb. 20, 2013). We deny the petition as to petitioner's questions I and III. We grant the petition as to petitioner's question II, dispense with further briefing, and remand to the Court of Appeals to clarify whether the survival claim was remanded to the trial court.

Respondent's complaint asserts damages recoverable under wrongful death and survival causes of action, and the trial judge recognized both causes of action. Respondent did not challenge the finding that two separate causes of action exist. The Court of Appeals' decision is unclear because it does not distinguish between the two causes of action or state whether the reversal and remand apply to the survival cause of action, but instead uses language such as "wrongful death claims" and "wrongful death and other claims." We therefore remand to the Court of Appeals to clarify whether its decision to reverse and remand to the lower court applies to the survival cause of action.

REMANDED.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Leclair v. Palmetto Health

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Jul 2, 2014
Appellate Case No. 2013-001061 (S.C. Jul. 2, 2014)
Case details for

Leclair v. Palmetto Health

Case Details

Full title:Ruth Sturkie LeClair, as Next of Kin to and Personal Representative of the…

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Date published: Jul 2, 2014

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2013-001061 (S.C. Jul. 2, 2014)