From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lebron v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 23, 2003
309 A.D.2d 1034 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

93506

Decided and Entered: October 23, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Spargo, J.), entered January 23, 2003 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition as moot.

Elvin Lebron, Pine City, appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Nancy A. Siegel of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Rose and, Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. After the Attorney General advised Supreme Court that the determination at issue had been administratively reversed and that all references thereto had been expunged from petitioner's institutional record, the court granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition as moot. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, we find no error in the court dismissing the matter (see Matter of Boyer v. Cohen, 257 A.D.2d 864; Matter of Stanislas v. Goord, 253 A.D.2d 918). To the extent that petitioner challenges information contained in his criminal history record, there is no evidence that petitioner availed himself of the procedures in 7 NYCRR part 5 and exhausted his administrative remedies (see Matter of Pickett v. Long, 229 A.D.2d 802).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Lebron v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 23, 2003
309 A.D.2d 1034 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Lebron v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ELVIN LEBRON, Appellant, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 23, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 1034 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
766 N.Y.S.2d 127

Citing Cases

Chavis v. Fischer

We affirm. Petitioner's challenge to the initial determination was moot once that determination was…

Chavis v. Fischer

We affirm. Petitioner's challenge to the initial determination was moot once that determination was…