From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lebron v. Camacho

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1998
251 A.D.2d 295 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 1, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendants established that the plaintiff Jose Lebron suffered only from mild cervical and lumbar strains and other injuries which have been held to be insignificant within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) ( see, Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955; Rhind v. Naylor, 187 A.D.2d 498). The papers submitted by the plaintiffs in opposition to the defendants' motion for summary judgment were insufficient to raise a question of fact on this issue ( see, Mobley v. Riportella, 241 A.D.2d 443; Antoniou v. Duff, 204 A.D.2d 670).

Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lebron v. Camacho

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1998
251 A.D.2d 295 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Lebron v. Camacho

Case Details

Full title:JOSE LEBRON et al., Appellants, v. ANTHONY CAMACHO et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 295 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 1025

Citing Cases

Ortiz v. Ash Leasing, Inc.

Mild sprains to the lumbar and cervical spine are insignificant and as a matter of law, do not constitute a…

Whitaker v. Soumano

Considering the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff (see Kesselman v Lever House Restaurant, 29…