From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leblanc v. Greenleaf

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 27, 2005
Civil Action No. 04-84J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 27, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-84J.

September 27, 2005


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

On September 2, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation, docket no. 24, recommending that the remaining defendant's motion for summary judgment, docket no. 22, be granted.

The parties were notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1), they had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No one has filed objections, and the time to do so has expired.

Upon review of the record and the Report and Recommendation, and noting the lack of objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2005, it is

ORDERED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment, docket no. 22, is granted, and the complaint is dismissed. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.


Summaries of

Leblanc v. Greenleaf

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 27, 2005
Civil Action No. 04-84J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 27, 2005)
Case details for

Leblanc v. Greenleaf

Case Details

Full title:LLOYD LEBLANC, Plaintiff, v. NORENE GREENLEAF Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 27, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-84J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 27, 2005)