From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lebensfeld v. Bashkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 1988
144 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

November 21, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Collins, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the trial court's finding that there are no valid defenses preventing specific performance of the contract. The defendants' preanswer cross motion seeking, inter alia, an order declaring the contract null and void and requesting attorneys' fees, without raising an objection to personal jurisdiction, effectively waived any jurisdictional defense (cf., Gager v. White, 53 N.Y.2d 475, 488, cert denied sub nom. Guertin Co. v. Cachat, 454 U.S. 1086; Flaks, Zaslow Co. v. Bank Computer Network Corp., 66 A.D.2d 363, 366-367, appeal dismissed 47 N.Y.2d 951). Moreover, the plaintiff Steven Lebensfeld, while not a signatory to the contract, could seek specific performance of the agreement as a third-party beneficiary since the contract was intended for the mutual benefit of himself and his wife, the plaintiff Jill Lebensfeld (see, Fourth Ocean Putnam Corp. v Interstate Wrecking Co., 66 N.Y.2d 38, 43-45; cf., Zelazny v Pilgrim Funding Corp., 41 Misc.2d 176, 183-184).

Finally, we reject the defendants' contention that the trial court was required to sua sponte disqualify trial counsel on the ground that he was a necessary witness (see, S S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v. 777 S.H. Corp., 69 N.Y.2d 437). Bracken, J.P., Kunzeman, Weinstein and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lebensfeld v. Bashkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 1988
144 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Lebensfeld v. Bashkin

Case Details

Full title:JILL LEBENSFELD et al., Respondents, v. ESTHER BASHKIN et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 21, 1988

Citations

144 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Silverboys, LLC v. Skordas

Therefore, Karen Silverman is not merely an incidental beneficiary. See Lebensfeld v. Bashkin, 144 A.D.2d…

Matter of Crawford v. Feldman

However, there is no requirement that the written agreement to arbitrate be signed, as long as there is other…