In Lebas Fashion Imports of USA, Inc. v. ITT Hartford Ins. Group, 44 Cal.App.4th 531, 52 Cal.Rptr.2d 26 (1996) ("Lebas I"), the California Court of Appeal analyzed the same issue under an identical provision in a Hartford CGL policy and found in favor of the insured.
Summary of this case from Arnette Optic Illusions, Inc. v. ITT Hartford Group, Inc.1996
In Lebas Fashion Imports of USA, Inc. v. ITT Hartford Ins. Group, 44 Cal.App.4th 531, 52 Cal.Rptr.2d 26 (1996) ("Lebas I"), the California Court of Appeal analyzed the same issue under an identical provision in a Hartford CGL policy and found in favor of the insured.
Summary of this case from Arnette Optic Illusions, Inc. v. ITT Hartford Group, Inc.Full title:Lebas Fashion Imports of USA, Inc. v. ITT Hartford Ins. Group and…
Court:Court of Appeal of California
Date published: Jan 1, 1996
On September 17, 1996, Arnette wrote to Hartford requesting reconsideration of the tender. In that letter,…
Zell v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Insurance"')" Additionally, in Employers Cas. Co. v. St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. (Cal.App. 1996) 52 Cal.Rptr.2d 17,…