From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lear v. Conanan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 17, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-1724 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-1724 EFB P

07-17-2012

ANDREW LEAR, Plaintiff, v. CONANAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Plaintiff alleges a violation of his civil rights in Kings County, California. Kings County is in the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, and this action should have been commenced there. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 120(d). Where a civil action has not been commenced in the proper division of a court, the court may, on its own motion, transfer the action to the proper division. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 120(f).

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that:

1. This action is transferred to the Fresno Division.

2. The Clerk of Court shall assign a new case number.

3. All future filings shall bear the new case number and shall be filed at:

United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721

____________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Lear v. Conanan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 17, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-1724 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Lear v. Conanan

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW LEAR, Plaintiff, v. CONANAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 17, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-1724 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2012)