From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lear Corporation v. Butzel Long PC

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 29, 2004
690 N.W.2d 103 (Mich. 2004)

Opinion

No. 127409 (32)(33).

December 29, 2004.


SC: 127409, COA: 258669, Ottawa CC: 04-050216-CZ.

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration and application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals are considered. The motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the Court of Appeals. The motion to admit Kimball R. Anderson, Charles B. Molster, III, Carol A. Joffe, and Anne W. Stukes pro hac vice is also considered, and it is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Lear Corporation v. Butzel Long PC

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 29, 2004
690 N.W.2d 103 (Mich. 2004)
Case details for

Lear Corporation v. Butzel Long PC

Case Details

Full title:LEAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUTZEL LONG PC, PHILIP J…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Dec 29, 2004

Citations

690 N.W.2d 103 (Mich. 2004)