Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-00968
05-17-2018
MICHELE A. LEAHY, Plaintiff, v. GARCES RESTAURANT GROUP LLC, et al Defendants.
PAPPERT, J. MEMORANDUM
Michele Leahy, represented by Disability Rights Pennsylvania, sued Garces Restaurant Group, LLC, 2401 Walnut Café, LLC, 2401 Walnut, LP, and Bedrock Group, Inc. for violations of the American with Disabilities Act. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) The parties resolved the litigation via a Consent Decree which the Court approved on October 25, 2017. They were unable, however, to agree on the amount of reasonable attorneys' fees owed to Leahy's lawyers under the ADA's fee shifting provision. (Consent Decree, ECF No. 39.) Defendants acknowledge that Leahy is the prevailing party and that the hourly rates for Leahy's attorneys are reasonable, but contend that the number of hours DRP attorneys worked on the case were excessive. DRP filed its Motion for Attorneys' Fees (Mot., ECF No. 43), to which the Defendants objected (Def. Resp. in Opp., ECF No. 44) and DRP replied (ECF No. 46). After reviewing the Motion, Response, Reply and all time sheets provided by DRP, the Court grants the Motion in part and denies it in part for the reasons explained below.
Under ¶ 8.1 of the Consent Decree, only 2401 Walnut Café, LLC, 2401 Walnut, LP, and Bedrock Group, Inc. (collectively "Defendants"), not Garces Restaurant Group, LLC, are responsible for the fees, expenses, and costs.
I
In the fall of 2016, Leahy learned that a new restaurant, 24 Wood Fired Fare, would be opening at 24th and Walnut Streets in Philadelphia. (Compl. ¶ 21.) Leahy uses a wheelchair for mobility and often dines out for personal and professional reasons. (Id. ¶¶ 11, 18-19.) She was concerned about the restaurant's accessibility and contacted DRP. (Id. ¶¶ 21-22.) DRP is a non-profit corporation "designated as the federally-mandated protection and advocacy agency in Pennsylvania." Who We Are, Disability Rights Pennsylvania, https://www.disabilityrightspa.org/who-we-are/ (last visited May 12, 2018). Specifically, DRP protects and advances the rights of people with disabilities, including litigating ADA compliance issues. Id.
DRP attorneys sent the Defendants a September 26, 2016 letter describing the various ADA compliance issues that were visible from outside the restaurant. (Mot., Ex. A ("Haubert Declaration") ¶ 3.) In response, Charles Block, a representative of the 2401 Defendants, contacted DRP attorney Dynah Haubert in early October 2016. (Id. ¶ 4.) Haubert sent Block a list of questions concerning the restaurant's accessibility and Block invited DRP to tour the restaurant and make suggestions that would address DRP's concerns. (Id. ¶ 5.) Haubert and Jamie Ray-Leonetti, another DRP attorney, visited the restaurant on October 21, 2016 and identified issues concerning the entryway on Walnut Street, signage, and the entrance at 24th and Sansom Streets. (Id. ¶ 6.) Over the next few months, the parties attempted to resolve the ADA compliance concerns but were unable to do so and DRP filed a one-count Complaint on Leahy's behalf on March 2, 2017. (ECF No. 1.)
In her Complaint, Leahy asserted that the restaurant violated the ADA because it lacked adequate ramps from the Walnut Street sidewalk to the patio and from the sidewalk to the Sansom Street entrance. She also alleged that there were not enough accessible parking spaces in the nearby parking lot. (Compl. ¶¶ 62-63, 72.) After several stipulations between the parties to extend the Defendants' time to respond to the Complaint, the Court ordered the Defendants to respond and the parties to exchange Rule 26(f) disclosures on or before May 26, 2017. (May 5 Order, ECF No. 16.) The Court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey for settlement discussions (Scheduling Order, ECF No. 24) and the parties participated in settlement conferences with Judge Hey on June 29, July 7, July 31, August 23, September 28 and October 13 (Minute Entries, ECF Nos. 25, 27, 30, 33, 35, 37).
The negotiations eventually resulted in the twelve-page Consent Decree pursuant to which the Defendants agreed to make the modifications necessary to ensure the restaurant's accessibility under the ADA. The modifications include the construction of a ramp from the sidewalk to the Walnut Street patio, ongoing maintenance of the Sansom Street ramp, the designation of accessible parking spots and the adjustment of bathroom doors to require less than five pounds of force to open. (Consent Decree ¶¶ 3-5.)
During a telephone conference on October 17, 2017 with the Court, the parties stated that they were "far apart" in their attorneys' fees negotiations. The Court conducted a subsequent telephone conference on December 18, 2017 where the parties informed the Court that they were still unable to resolve the matter without Court intervention. Plaintiff's attorneys then filed this Motion.
II
The ADA provides that a court may allow the prevailing party to recover "a reasonable attorney's fee, including litigation expenses, and costs." 42 U.S.C. § 12205. A plaintiff is a "prevailing party" if "they succeed on any significant issue in litigation which achieves some of the benefit the [party] sought in bringing suit." Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433 (1983). In statutory fee shifting cases, the party seeking fees has the burden to prove its request is reasonable and can meet its burden by submitting "evidence supporting the hours worked and the rates claimed." Rode v. Dellarciprete, 892 F.2d 1177, 1183 (3d Cir. 1990). The Court multiples the hourly rate by the number of hours to obtain the lodestar, which is presumed to be the reasonable fee, id., and the Court "may not award less in fees than requested unless the opposing party makes specific objections to the fee request," United States v. Eleven Vehicles, Their Equipment and Accessories, 200 F.3d 203, 212 (3d Cir. 2000).
The party opposing the fee award "has the burden to challenge, by affidavit or brief with sufficient specificity to give fee applicants notice, the reasonableness of the requested fee." Rode, 892 F.2d at 1183. The party does not need to challenge specific time entries but must "identify the type of work being challenged" and "specifically state [the] grounds for contending that the hours claimed in that area are unreasonable." Bell v. United Princeton Properties, Inc., 884 F.2d 713, 720 (3d Cir. 1989). "Hours are not reasonably expended if they are excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary." Rode, 892 F.2d at 1183. Although the Court cannot decrease the fee award based on factors not raised by the adverse party, it has "a great deal of discretion in deciding what a reasonable fee award is, so long as the reduction is based on objections actually raised by the adverse party." Bell, 884 F.2d at 721. In light of objections, the Court "will inevitably be required to engage in a fair amount of judgment calling based upon its experience with the case and its general experience as to how much time a case requires." Id.
III
A
DRP submitted time sheets indicating the amount of time spent on each task throughout the litigation. DRP seeks $53,138 for 216.5 hours of work and $1,245 for litigation expenses and costs. Again, there is no dispute that Leahy is a "prevailing party" and the Defendants do not object to the litigation expenses and costs or the hourly rates charged. While the Defendants take issue with virtually all aspects of DRP's bills, the Court can address only those fees to which the Defendants have objected with the requisite specificity.
The attorneys' rates per hour are as follows: Shanon Levin ($355), Kelly Darr ($355), Jamie Ray-Leonetti ($335), Rocco Iacullo ($305), Dynah Haubert ($200). (Mot., at 8.)
As often happens, the parties blame each other in a number of ways for the protracted nature of the dispute. Defendants first contend that the fees should be reduced because they only paid their lawyers $10,470 to resolve the case. (Def. Resp. in Opp. at 7.) Their attorneys' decision to work fewer hours (or charge their clients for less time than they worked) does not in and of itself make the amount of time that DRP lawyers spent unreasonable. See Harlan v. NRA Grp., LLC, No. 10-0324, 2011 WL 813961, at *1 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2011). Further, this objection does not identify the type of work being challenged.
They next contend that the hours overall are unreasonable because DRP should not have filed a Complaint, something Defendants contend was unnecessary. (Def. Resp. in Opp. at 3, 8.) Although the parties worked to resolve Leahy's concerns both before and after she filed the Complaint, the pleading was certainly not frivolous. Defendants agreed to make certain modifications that were specified in the Complaint and prior negotiations certainly do not foreclose a plaintiff's right to file a Complaint.
B
Defendants also object to the amount of time spent on discovery related work. (Def. Resp. in Opp. at 8, 11 n.8.) DRP served requests for admission, interrogatories, and document requests to all Defendants. See (Appendix A). Defendants contend that much of the discovery was unnecessary because most of it "related to matters not in dispute." (Def. Resp. in Opp. at 9.) They argue further that the amount of time spent was "absurdly excessive" since there were no motions filed, no depositions taken, and they did not serve any discovery requests on Leahy. (Id. at 11 n.8, 8.) While Defendants contend that DRP spent 103 hours on discovery related work (id. at 11 n.8), DRP claims it spent 34.2 hours on those tasks (Reply, at 4). The Court reviewed the time sheets DRP submitted and attributes 45.3 hours to discovery. See (Appendix A).
The Complaint and Consent Decree demonstrate that the necessary modifications to the restaurant were seemingly obvious and few in number. Time expended drafting a "discovery plan" was excessive and the Court reduces that time from 3.3 to 2.1 hours. (Entries 116, 145). DRP attorneys seek payment for 8.1 hours of work on the Rule 26(f) report, preparing for the Rule 16 conference, and conferring with each other about the conference, an excessive amount of time which the Court reduces by 2.6 hours. The lawyers also charge an excessive amount of time for drafting and revising discovery requests; the case was small in scope and the parties were at all relevant times actively negotiating a resolution. The Court reduces that time by 12.7 hours. (Entries 183-189.) Defendants correctly point out that there was not much "of real substance" that took place after the Complaint was filed. Defendants propounded no discovery, there were no depositions taken or motions filed, and the dispute was very narrow in scope. The Court accordingly reduces the total amount of time spent on discovery related work by 18.6 hours. See (Appendix A).
All entries are listed on Appendix A. --------
C
In their fourth objection, Defendants contend that DRP spent an excessive amount of time working on the Complaint. (Def. Resp. in Opp. at 11 n.8.) Defendants assert that DRP spent 64.8 hours on such work (id.) while DRP contends that it seeks payment for 29.8 hours (Reply, at 4). The Court concludes that DRP spent 41.2 hours on Complaint related work. See (Appendix A). This includes time spent researching and visiting the restaurant and drafting and editing the Complaint.
Defendants object to the excessive time spent on such work since the case is a simple one. (Def. Resp. in Opp. at 11 n.8.) Leahy's Complaint asserts one count under the ADA contending that a restaurant was not accessible to those like her who need a wheelchair for mobility. While such concerns are undoubtedly important, the nature of this dispute was far from complex. DRP is designated as the federally-mandated protection advocacy program in Pennsylvania and it routinely litigates ADA compliance issues. Further, the barriers at the restaurant were minimal. The Court reduces the amount of time spent drafting the Complaint from 10.8 to 4.0 hours (Entries 39, 45, 47, 51) and the amount of time spent editing the pleading from 11 to 3 hours (Entries 52-55, 57, 59, 60). In sum, the Court reduces the total amount of Complaint related work by 16.6 hours. See (Appendix A).
IV
The Court reduces those aspects of DRP's request to which the Defendants objected by 35.2 hours and approves 181.3 hours of time reasonably spent on the case for a total $43,203 in attorneys' fees and $1,245 in costs.
An appropriate Order follows.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J . Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.
Appendix A - Reasonable Attorneys' Fees Entry Date Provided By Description Hours Claimed Hours Revised Rate Subtotal Category 1 9/16/2016 Dynah Haubert Research and draft letter to Garces Group re: ADA violations at 2401 Walnut 2.4 2.4 $ 200 $ 480.00 Complaint 2 9/19/2016 Dynah Haubert Research and draft letter to Garces Group re: ADA violations at 2401 Walnut 1.2 1.2 $ 200 $ 240.00 Complaint 3 9/19/2016 Jamie Ray-Leonetti research on restaurant 0.5 0.5 $ 335 $ 167.50 Complaint 4 9/20/2016 Dynah Haubert Research and draft letter to Garces Group re: ADA violations at 2401 Walnut 1.1 1.1 $ 200 $ 220.00 Complaint 5 9/20/2016 Jamie Ray-Leonetti review and revise Garces letter 0.5 0.5 $ 335 $ 167.50 6 9/21/2016 Dynah Haubert Edit letter to Garces Group re: ADA violations at 2401 Walnut 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 7 9/21/2016 Dynah Haubert Discussion with JRL on letter 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 8 9/21/2016 Jamie Ray-Leonetti discussion with Dynah on letter 0.3 0.3 $ 335 $ 100.50 9 9/21/2016 Jamie Ray-Leonetti discussion with Rocco on letter 0.2 0.2 $ 335 $ 67.00 10 9/21/2016 Rocco Iacullo Discussion with JRL on letter 0.2 0.2 $ 305 $ 61.00 11 9/22/2016 Dynah Haubert Final edits to letter re ADA violations at 2401 0.7 0.7 $ 200 $ 140.00 12 10/4/2016 Dynah Haubert TC w/ Charles Block from 2401 Walnut re: restaurant entrance 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 Complaint 13 10/6/2016 Jamie Ray-Leonetti meet with KD about Garces follow up 0.5 0.5 $ 335 $ 167.50 Complaint 14 10/6/2016 Kelly Darr Meet wth JRL re Garces next steps 0.5 0.5 $ 355 $ 177.50 15 10/6/2016 Jamie Ray-Leonetti TC with building owner about plans 0.3 0.3 $ 335 $ 100.50 Complaint 16 10/11/2016 Jamie Ray-Leonetti emails with building owner about plans 0.2 0.2 $ 335 $ 67.00 Complaint 17 10/18/2016 Jamie Ray-Leonetti internet research re: Garces, 2401 1 1 $ 335 $ 335.00 Complaint 18 10/19/2016 Jamie Ray-Leonetti mtg with KD and DH re site visit 0.5 0.5 $ 335 $ 167.50 19 10/19/2016 Kelly Darr Meet w/ JRL & DH re site visit 0.5 0.5 $ 355 $ 177.50 20 10/19/2016 Dynah Haubert Meet w/ KD & JRL re site visit (.5); meet w/ JRL re same (.5) 1 1 $ 200 $ 200.00 21 10/19/2016 Jamie Ray-Leonetti call with C Block and follow up with DH for site visit 1 1 $ 335 $ 335.00 22 10/20/2016 Dynah Haubert Drafted checklist for site visit to 2401 Walnut 0.9 0.9 $ 200 $ 180.00 23 10/21/2016 Dynah Haubert Visited 24 (.6 travel to 24; .7 conduct site visit/meet with Rob Esplen and mgr Natasha; .3 travel back from 24) 1.6 1.6 $ 200 $ 320.00 Complaint 24 10/21/2016 Dynah Haubert Wrote up notes from visit to 24 1.4 1.4 $ 200 $ 280.00 Complaint 25 10/26/2016 Dynah Haubert Review Jamie's additions to site visit notes 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 26 10/28/2016 Dynah Haubert Met with legal director to discuss site visit and next steps 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 27 10/28/2016 Kelly Darr Meet w/ DH re site visit, next steps 0.5 0.5 $ 355 $ 177.50 28 11/1/2016 Dynah Haubert Reviewed correspondence to prep for call to C. Block; LVM for him 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 29 11/1/2016 Dynah Haubert Emailed JRL about C. Block's ? about signage 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 30 11/2/2016 Dynah Haubert Researched ADA's signage requirements and drafted reply to C. Block re same 1.2 1.2 $ 200 $ 240.00 Complaint 31 11/3/2016 Dynah Haubert Meeting with JRL re site visit followup 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 32 11/3/2016 Jamie Ray-Leonetti mtg with Dynah re follow up from site visit 0.5 0.5 $ 335 $ 167.50 33 11/4/2016 Dynah Haubert Met with JRL to discuss response to R. Esplen email 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 34 11/4/2016 Jamie Ray-Leonetti Met with DH to discuss response to R. Esplen email 0.2 0.2 $ 335 $ 67.00 35 11/7/2016 Dynah Haubert Met w/ client and JRL & discussed next steps 1 1 $ 200 $ 200.00 36 11/7/2016 Jamie Ray-Leonetti mtg with Dynah and client 1 1 $ 335 $ 335.00 37 11/22/2016 Dynah Haubert TC w/ M. Leahy re: her visit to 24 0.4 0.4 $ 200 $ 80.00 Complaint 38 11/22/2016 Jamie Ray-Leonetti phone call with client re: her visit to 24 0.4 0 $ 335 $ - Complaint 39 12/2/2016 Jamie Ray-Leonetti draft portions of complaint 2 0 $ 335 $ - Complaint 40 12/6/2016 Dynah Haubert Drafted complaint 0.6 0.6 $ 200 $ 120.00 Complaint 10 41 12/7/2016 Dynah Haubert Drafted complaint 2.9 2.9 $ 200 $ 580.00 Complaint 42 12/13/2016 Jamie Ray-Leonetti T/C with client 0.3 0.3 $ 335 $ 100.50 43 12/14/2016 Jamie Ray-Leonetti Research - new construction claims 1 1 $ 335 $ 335.00 Complaint 44 12/16/2016 Dynah Haubert Drafted claims section of complaint 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 Complaint 45 1/9/2017 Dynah Haubert Drafted sections of complaint 0.8 0 $ 200 $ - Complaint 46 1/9/2017 Dynah Haubert Researched identities of proper defendants 0.9 0.9 $ 200 $ 180.00 Complaint 47 1/24/2017 Jamie Ray-Leonetti drafting complaint 2 0 $ 335 $ - Complaint 48 1/25/2017 Dynah Haubert Discussion with JRL re: existing alteration 0.4 0.4 $ 200 $ 80.00 Complaint 49 1/25/2017 Jamie Ray-Leonetti discussion with Dynah- existing alteration 0.4 0 $ 335 $ - Complaint 50 1/25/2017 Jamie Ray-Leonetti Dynah - emails 0.2 0.2 $ 335 $ 67.00 51 1/26/2017 Jamie Ray-Leonetti complaint - draft and revise facts 2 0 $ 335 $ - Complaint 52 1/30/2017 Dynah Haubert Edit complaint 3 2 $ 200 $ 400.00 Complaint 53 1/31/2017 Jamie Ray-Leonetti Garces complaint 3 0 $ 335 $ - Complaint 54 2/2/2017 Dynah Haubert Edited complaint 1.3 0 $ 200 $ - Complaint 55 2/3/2017 Jamie Ray-Leonetti revisions to complaint 2 1 $ 335 $ 335.00 Complaint 56 2/10/2017 Jamie Ray-Leonetti meet with Kelly re- complaint 1 1 $ 335 $ 335.00 Complaint 57 2/10/2017 Kelly Darr Meet with JRL re: complaint 1 0 $ 355 $ - Complaint 58 2/14/2017 Jamie Ray-Leonetti T/C with client 0.5 0.5 $ 335 $ 167.50 59 2/27/2017 Kelly Darr Review and revise complaint 0.7 0 $ 355 $ - Complaint 60 3/1/2017 Jamie Ray-Leonetti edit and review complaint with cl 1 0 $ 335 $ - Complaint 61 3/1/2017 Jamie Ray-Leonetti prep complaint to file 0.5 0.5 $ 335 $ 167.50 Complaint 62 3/2/2017 Jamie Ray-Leonetti additional cover sheets etc. to file 0.3 0.3 $ 335 $ 100.50 Complaint 63 3/6/6017 Jamie Ray-Leonetti issues regarding service of process with JA 1 1 $ 335 $ 335.00 Complaint 64 3/7/2017 Jamie Ray-Leonetti call with client - update 0.4 0.4 $ 335 $ 134.00 65 3/8/2017 Shanon Levin Review file 1 1 $ 355 $ 355.00 66 3/9/2017 Dynah Haubert File and task review meeting with S. Levin 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 67 3/9/2017 Shanon Levin File and task review; meet w/ Dhaubert 0.5 0.5 $ 355 $ 177.50 68 3/15/2017 Dynah Haubert Reviewed Judge Pappert's procedures 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 69 3/15/2017 Dynah Haubert TC to client (w/ SL) re: change in representation, next steps 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 70 3/15/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ SL re: setting up next meeting w/ client, retainer agreement 0.1 0.1 $ 200 $ 20.00 71 3/15/2017 Dynah Haubert TCs with adjuster N Gargano re: coverage, earliest date client addressed the issue 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 72 3/15/2017 Shanon Levin T/c w/ client and meet with DHaubert re same 0.4 0.4 $ 355 $ 142.00 73 3/16/2017 Dynah Haubert Left VM and emailed C. Block; conferred w/ SL re same 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 74 3/16/2017 Shanon Levin Confer w/ DH re C Block 0.1 0.1 $ 355 $ 35.50 75 3/17/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ C. Block re settlement possibilities (ramp to patio) 0.6 0.6 $ 200 $ 120.00 76 3/17/2017 Dynah Haubert Conferred w/ SL re C. Block TC, response 0.4 0.4 $ 200 $ 80.00 77 3/17/2017 Dynah Haubert Emailed client re: retainer and setting up teleconference 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 78 3/17/2017 Shanon Levin Review complaint (.1); research (.1); meet w/ DHaubert re t/c from Defendant and next steps (.4) 0.6 0.6 $ 355 $ 213.00 79 3/21/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ C. Block re settlement possibilities (required architectural mods, atty fees) and ext of time to answer 0.4 0.4 $ 200 $ 80.00 80 3/21/2017 Dynah Haubert Emailed client re: retainer and teleconference 0.1 0.1 $ 200 $ 20.00 81 3/21/2017 Dynah Haubert Drafted list of all steps necessary for full relief 1 1 $ 200 $ 200.00 82 3/21/2017 Dynah Haubert Review entries of appearance and fwd to docket filing 0.1 0.1 $ 200 $ 20.00 83 3/21/2017 Dynah Haubert Confer W/ SL re TC w/ C. Block and relief list 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 84 3/21/2017 Dynah Haubert Update retainer and email same to client for signature 0.4 0.4 $ 200 $ 80.00 85 3/21/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re settlement possibility 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 11 86 3/22/2017 Dynah Haubert Confer w/ admin staff re: service addresses of unrepresented defendants; email SL re same 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 Complaint 87 3/22/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft and edit full relief list; send same to SL 0.8 0.8 $ 200 $ 160.00 88 3/22/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ A. Goldstein re Garces Restaurant Group 0.1 0.1 $ 200 $ 20.00 89 3/22/2017 Dynah Haubert Confer with S. Levin and R. Iacullo re obligation of Garces RG under Title III 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 90 3/22/2017 Rocco Iacullo confer w/ SL and DH re Garces RG Title III oblg. 0.2 0.2 $ 305 $ 61.00 91 3/22/2017 Dynah Haubert Confer w/ SL re defense counsel TCs 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 92 3/22/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re calls from defense counsel 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 93 3/22/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert and RIacullo re dismissal of parties/re obligation of Garces RG under Title III 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 94 3/23/2017 Dynah Haubert Emailed with J. Kinkopf re: Stipulation to extend time to respond and setting up teleconference 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 95 3/23/2017 Dynah Haubert Emailed with P. Buchanan re: Stipulation to extend time to respond 0.1 0.1 $ 200 $ 20.00 96 3/23/2017 Shanon Levin Review filings and correspondence; review photos of ADA violations 0.8 0.8 $ 355 $ 284.00 Discovery Related 97 3/24/2017 Dynah Haubert Review defendants' disclosure statements and send to docket filing 0.1 0 $ 200 $ - Discovery Related 98 3/24/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/J.Kinkopf re resolution possibilities (.2); email & confer w/ S. Levin re same (.5) 0.7 0.7 $ 200 $ 140.00 99 3/24/2017 Shanon Levin Emails w/ DHaubert re settlement and meet w/ DHaubert re same 0.5 0.5 $ 355 $ 177.50 100 3/28/2017 Dynah Haubert Review Judge's procedure re Rule 26 f meeting and email counsel to schedule same 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 Discovery Related 101 3/28/2017 Dynah Haubert Emailed w/ J. Kinkopf to arrange teleconference re: possibilities for settlement 0.1 0.1 $ 200 $ 20.00 102 3/28/2017 Dynah Haubert Discussion w/ SLevin re Rule 26(f) and settlement 0.2 0 $ 200 $ - Discovery Related 103 3/28/2017 Shanon Levin Discussions w/ DHaubert re Rule 26(f) and settlement 0.2 0 $ 355 $ - Discovery Related 104 3/29/2017 Shanon Levin Review and discuss settlement offer; research re prevailing party 1.4 1.4 $ 355 $ 497.00 105 3/30/2017 Dynah Haubert Confer w/S. Levin re next steps; strategy 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 106 3/30/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re settlement strategy 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 107 4/3/2017 Dynah Haubert Review parking lot plan provided by C. Block to determine ADA compliance/info needed 0.9 0.9 $ 200 $ 180.00 Discovery Related 108 4/3/2017 Dynah Haubert Review ramp plan provided by C. Block to determine ADA compliance/info needed 1.2 1.2 $ 200 $ 240.00 Discovery Related 109 4/3/2017 Dynah Haubert TC re settlement incl. arch. barriers w/ J. Kinkopf & C. Block (.6); confer w/ SL re same (.4) 1 1 $ 200 $ 200.00 110 4/3/2017 Dynah Haubert Research & draft confirming email (incl. detail re each arch. barrier) to J. Kinkopf 1.3 1.3 $ 200 $ 260.00 111 4/3/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re settlement and t/c w/ counsel re same 1 1 $ 355 $ 355.00 112 4/3/2017 Shanon Levin Review emails to counsel re summary 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 113 4/4/2017 Shanon Levin Rule 26(f) prep 0.3 0 $ 355 $ - Discovery Related 114 4/5/2017 Dynah Haubert Review Rule 26f;Judge's procedures;and local rules in prep for meeting w/ S. Levin re: Rule26f conference 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 Discovery Related 115 4/5/2017 Dynah Haubert Meet w/ S. Levin to prep for Rule 26f conference 0.3 0 $ 200 $ - Discovery Related 116 4/5/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft discovery outline incl. subject areas for document requests 1.2 0 $ 200 $ - Discovery Related 117 4/6/2017 Dynah Haubert Review &respond to emails among counsel re rescheduling 26f meeting 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 Discovery Related 118 4/6/2017 Shanon Levin Review discovery plan and emails re same 0.9 0 $ 355 $ - Discovery Related 119 4/11/2017 Dynah Haubert Review updated ramp plans for ADA compliance and draft email to J. Kinkopf re: same 2 2 $ 200 $ 400.00 Discovery Related 120 4/11/2017 Dynah Haubert Confer w/ R. Iacullo re: settlement possibilities, ramp plans 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 121 4/11/2017 Dynah Haubert Email w/ J. Kinkopf re: scheduling 26f 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 Discovery Related 12 122 4/11/2017 Rocco Iacullo Confer w/ D. Haubert re: settlement possibilities, ramp plans 0.3 0.3 $ 305 $ 91.50 123 4/12/2017 Dynah Haubert Email w/ M. Leahy re retainer and to arrange TC 0.1 0.1 $ 200 $ 20.00 124 4/13/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ M. Leahy re case updates (.4); notes re same (.2) 0.6 0.6 $ 200 $ 120.00 125 4/17/2017 Dynah Haubert Email w/ M. Leahy re retainer; file same 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 126 4/18/2017 Dynah Haubert Email w/ counsel re scheduling 26(f) 0.1 0.1 $ 200 $ 20.00 Discovery Related 127 4/18/2017 Dynah Haubert Review docs and info from J. Kinkopf re Walnut St. ramp(.2); confer w S. Levin re: same 0.4 0.4 $ 200 $ 80.00 Discovery Related 128 4/18/2017 Shanon Levin Confer w/ DH re info from counsel re Walnut St. ramp 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 129 4/19/2017 Dynah Haubert Review info from J. Kinkopf re Walnut St. ramp, other architectural barriers for ADA compliance 1.3 1.3 $ 200 $ 260.00 130 4/20/2017 Dynah Haubert Calculate updated time & attorneys fees 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 131 4/20/2017 Dynah Haubert Review parking lot plans and photos sent by J. Kinkopf for ADA compliance (.3); conference w/ R. Iacullo re: same (.9) 1.1 1.1 $ 200 $ 220.00 Discovery Related 132 4/20/2017 Rocco Iacullo Confer w/ DH re parking lot compliance 0.8 0.8 $ 305 $ 244.00 133 4/20/2017 Dynah Haubert Rule 26(f)/ settlement teleconference 1 1 $ 200 $ 200.00 Discovery Related 134 4/20/2017 Dynah Haubert Meet w/ SLevin re: discovery and settlement 0.2 0 $ 200 $ - Discovery Related 135 4/20/2017 Shanon Levin Prepare for and attend Rule 26(f) conference 1 0 $ 355 $ - Discovery Related 136 4/20/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re discovery and settlement 0.2 0 $ 355 $ - Discovery Related 137 4/21/2017 Dynah Haubert Edit Stip. for ext of time to reflect counsels' convo.; confer w/ S. Levin re: same; circulate same via email 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 138 4/21/2017 Dynah Haubert Review all plans provided to date and confer w/ R. Iacullo re: same 0.8 0.8 $ 200 $ 160.00 139 4/21/2017 Shanon Levin Review proposed stipulation; meet w/ DHaubert re same 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 140 4/21/2017 Rocco Iacullo Confer w/ DH re architectural plans 0.8 0.8 $ 305 $ 244.00 141 4/26/2017 Dynah Haubert Research and draft reply to J. Kinkopf re: parking lot, rear door and ramp surface 1.2 1.2 $ 200 $ 240.00 Discovery Related 142 4/26/2017 Shanon Levin Prepare consent decree 1.7 1.7 $ 355 $ 603.50 143 4/26/2017 Shanon Levin Email correspondence re discovery plan 0.2 0 $ 355 $ - Discovery Related 144 4/28/2017 Dynah Haubert Review S. Levin's draft of consent decree 0.1 0.1 $ 200 $ 20.00 145 4/28/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft discovery plan 2.1 2.1 $ 200 $ 420.00 Discovery Related 146 4/28/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft Pl's initial disclosures 0.4 0.4 $ 200 $ 80.00 Discovery Related 147 5/1/2017 Dynah Haubert Meet w/ Slevin re: Rule 26(f) plan and review/edit draft plan 0.4 0.4 $ 200 $ 80.00 Discovery Related 148 5/1/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re Rule 26(f) plan and review/edit draft plan 0.4 0 $ 355 $ - Discovery Related 149 5/2/2017 Shanon Levin Review letter from defense counsel 0.5 0.5 $ 355 $ 177.50 150 5/3/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft timeline of pre-filing communications w/ Defs for SL 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 151 5/3/2017 Dynah Haubert Review & edit S. Levin letter to Judge 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 152 5/3/2017 Shanon Levin Emails re Rule 26(f) conference 0.2 0 $ 355 $ - Discovery Related 153 5/4/2017 Dynah Haubert Edit & finalize initial disclosures 0.4 0.4 $ 200 $ 80.00 Discovery Related 154 5/4/2017 Dynah Haubert Attend teleconference with counsel & judge 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 155 5/4/2017 Dynah Haubert Meet w/ SLevin re court conference, outcome, and strategy 0.4 0.4 $ 200 $ 80.00 156 5/4/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re court conference, outcome, and strategy 0.4 0.4 $ 355 $ 142.00 157 5/5/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft consent decree 1.4 1.4 $ 200 $ 280.00 158 5/5/2017 Dynah Haubert Review court order; meet w/ SLevin re next steps 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 159 5/5/2017 Shanon Levin Review court order; meet w/ DHaubert re next steps 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 160 5/8/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft consent decree 3.8 3.8 $ 200 $ 760.00 161 5/9/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft& edit Consent Decree 1.2 1.2 $ 200 $ 240.00 162 5/9/2017 Dynah Haubert Confer w/ S. Levin re consent decree 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 163 5/9/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ client re case updates, consent decree 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 164 5/9/2017 Shanon Levin Review emails and meet w/ DHaubert re next steps, consent decree 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 13 165 5/10/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft & edit consent decree 0.8 0.8 $ 200 $ 160.00 166 5/10/2017 Dynah Haubert Meet w/ SLevin re consent decree and experts 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 167 5/10/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re consent decree and experts 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 168 5/11/2017 Dynah Haubert Calculate attorneys fees 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 169 5/11/2017 Dynah Haubert Meet w/ SLevin re status and t/c w/ client 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 170 5/11/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re status and t/c w/ client 0.5 0.5 $ 355 $ 177.50 171 5/19/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ R Thomas re: consulting on case 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 172 5/23/2017 Dynah Haubert Revise rept of rule 26 f meeting/status rept and send to opposing counsel 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 Discovery Related 173 5/23/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft requests for admission 0.8 0.8 $ 200 $ 160.00 Discovery Related 174 5/24/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft RFAs 0.9 0.9 $ 200 $ 180.00 Discovery Related 175 5/25/2017 Dynah Haubert Review 2401 Defs' Answer 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 Discovery Related 176 5/25/2017 Dynah Haubert Review Garces' Answer 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 Discovery Related 177 5/25/2017 Dynah Haubert Revise 26(f) report and email to defs' counsel 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 Discovery Related 178 5/25/2017 Dynah Haubert Meet w/ SLevin re discovery and answer 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 Discovery Related 179 5/25/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re discovery and answer 0.5 0 $ 355 $ - Discovery Related 180 5/26/2017 Dynah Haubert Prepare discovery requests 0.7 0.7 $ 200 $ 140.00 Discovery Related 181 5/30/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft interrogatories 1.3 1.3 $ 200 $ 260.00 Discovery Related 182 5/31/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft reqs. for admission, interrogatories,and doc. requests 5.1 5.1 $ 200 $ 1,020.00 Discovery Related 183 6/1/2017 Shanon Levin Review and revise discovery requests 1.2 0 $ 355 $ - Discovery Related 184 6/2/2017 Dynah Haubert Edit RFAs 1.6 0 $ 200 $ - Discovery Related 185 6/2/2017 Shanon Levin Review and revise discovery requests 1.2 0 $ 355 $ - Discovery Related 186 6/5/2017 Dynah Haubert Meet w/ SLevin re discovery requests and court conference 0.4 0 $ 200 $ - Discovery Related 187 6/5/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft 1st Interrogs, RFA, Doc Requests to all defs. 5.3 0 $ 200 $ - Discovery Related 188 6/5/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re discovery requests and court conference 0.4 0 $ 355 $ - Discovery Related 189 6/6/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft 1st Interrogs, RFA, Doc Requests to all defs. 2.6 0 $ 200 $ - Discovery Related 190 6/14/2017 Dynah Haubert Review J's procedures and fed/local rules to prep for rule 16 conference 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 Discovery Related 191 6/15/2017 Dynah Haubert Confer w/ SL to prep for Rule 16 conference 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 Discovery Related 192 6/15/2017 Dynah Haubert Review docs to prep for Rule 16 conference 1 1 $ 200 $ 200.00 Discovery Related 193 6/15/2017 Shanon Levin Prepare w/ DHaubert re Rule 16 Conference 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 Discovery Related 194 6/16/2017 Dynah Haubert Rule 16 conference 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 Discovery Related 195 6/16/2017 Dynah Haubert Confer w/ S Levin re Rule 16 conference, next steps 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 Discovery Related 196 6/16/2017 Shanon Levin Confer w/ DHaubert re Rule 16 conference and strategy 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 Discovery Related 197 6/19/2017 Dynah Haubert Confer w/ S Levine re: experts 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 198 6/19/2017 Dynah Haubert Confer w/ Dhaubert re : experts 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 199 6/28/2017 Shanon Levin Consider status and strategy; review email correspondance 0.4 0.4 $ 355 $ 142.00 200 6/29/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re conference w/ Judge 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 201 6/29/2017 Dynah Haubert meet w/ SL re conference w/ Judge 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 202 6/30/2017 Dynah Haubert TC to client to update 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 203 6/30/2017 Kelly Darr Meeting w/ DH re: fees 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 204 6/30/2017 Dynah Haubert Discuss fees w/ KD 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 205 7/6/2017 Dynah Haubert Prepare settlement memo 1.4 1.4 $ 200 $ 280.00 206 7/6/2017 Shanon Levin Review and revise settlement memo; review defs' changes to consent decree and meet w/ Dhaubert re same 1.9 1.9 $ 355 $ 674.50 207 7/6/2017 Dynah Haubert Meet w/ SL re changes to CD 0.6 0.6 $ 200 $ 120.00 208 7/7/2017 Shanon Levin Prep for and attend settlement conference 2.7 2.7 $ 355 $ 958.50 209 7/7/2017 Dynah Haubert Prep, attend settlement conference 2.5 2.5 $ 200 $ 500.00 210 7/7/2017 Shanon Levin Review and respond to emails; comment on draft communications 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 211 7/10/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re strategy 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 14 212 7/10/2017 Dynah Haubert Confer w/ SL re strategy 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 213 7/11/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ MJ Hey and counsel re exhibits (.3); draft letter to DMccomb clarifying what we need for exhibits 1.7 1.7 $ 200 $ 340.00 214 7/11/2017 Dynah Haubert Confer / SL re court conference 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 215 7/11/2017 Shanon Levin Confer w/ DHaubert re conference with Court 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 216 7/11/2017 Shanon Levin Emails re consent decree exhibits; draft correspondence; review defs' consent decree 1.2 1.2 $ 355 $ 426.00 217 7/12/2017 Dynah Haubert Continue drafting letter (.4); confer re same w SL (.2) 0.6 0.6 $ 200 $ 120.00 218 7/12/2017 Dynah Haubert Review defs' exhibits provided today 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 219 7/12/2017 Dynah Haubert Emails and TC w/ DMccomb re curb in parking lot 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 220 7/12/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ counsel and Magistrate re settlement next steps 0.1 0.1 $ 200 $ 20.00 221 7/12/2017 Shanon Levin Review and comment on letter to Judge; meet w/ DHaubert re court conference and strategy 0.4 0.4 $ 355 $ 142.00 222 7/26/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ R Thomas re: update on his evaluation; notes/email to S Levin re same 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 223 7/31/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft email to OC re today's conference and issues to discuss 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 224 7/31/2017 Dynah Haubert Attend teleconference w/ magistrate judge re status 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 225 8/1/2017 Dynah Haubert Edit proposed consent decree 1.9 1.9 $ 200 $ 380.00 226 8/2/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ expert R Thomas re his review of site & exhibits 1 1 $ 200 $ 200.00 227 8/2/2017 Dynah Haubert Revise & analyze notes from call w/ expert 0.4 0.4 $ 200 $ 80.00 228 8/3/2017 Dynah Haubert Confer w. SL re expert's recommendations 1 1 $ 200 $ 200.00 229 8/3/2017 Dynah Haubert Edits to CD 1 1 $ 200 $ 200.00 230 8/3/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DH re expert's recommendations 1 1 $ 355 $ 355.00 231 8/4/2017 Dynah Haubert Make edits to CD to incorporate expert recommendations 1.6 1.6 $ 200 $ 320.00 232 8/4/2017 Dynah Haubert Confer w/ SL re edits to CD 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 233 8/4/2017 Dynah Haubert Final edits to CD, gather and verify labels on all exhibits 0.7 0.7 $ 200 $ 140.00 234 8/4/2017 Shanon Levin Review and comment on consent decree; meet w/ DHaubert re expert's comments 0.7 0.7 $ 355 $ 248.50 235 8/8/2017 Dynah Haubert Corr. w/ client re CD 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 236 8/8/2017 Dynah Haubert Gather CD & exhibits and email to OC 0.1 0.1 $ 200 $ 20.00 237 8/14/2017 Dynah Haubert Teleconference w/ OC and C. Block re changes to consent decree (.6); report to SL re same (.1) 0.7 0.7 $ 200 $ 140.00 238 8/14/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re conference w/ defense counsel 0.1 0.1 $ 355 $ 35.50 239 8/15/2017 Dynah Haubert Followup from 8/14 TC: edit consent decree, research re 2401's concerns re lot, email expert R. Thomas re lot 0.7 0.7 $ 200 $ 140.00 240 8/15/2017 Dynah Haubert Review and incorporate defendant Garces' changes to consent decree 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 241 8/16/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ R. Thomas re parking lot concerns (.2), notes to file re same (.2) 0.4 0.4 $ 200 $ 80.00 242 8/21/2017 Dynah Haubert draft email to OC AND JOINT STATUS REPORT .2; CONFERW/ sl RE SAME.2 0.4 0.4 $ 200 $ 80.00 243 8/21/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft status report addendum .3; confer w/ SL re same .2 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 244 8/21/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re status; review and revise Status Report 0.5 0.5 $ 355 $ 177.50 245 8/22/2017 Dynah Haubert Confer w/ SL re status report to court 0.1 0.1 $ 200 $ 20.00 246 8/22/2017 Shanon Levin Review and comment on revised consent decree; meet w/ DHaubert re status report to judge 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 247 8/22/2017 Dynah Haubert review SL edits to CD 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 248 8/23/2017 Shanon Levin Confer w/ DH re CD, conference 0.1 0.1 $ 355 $ 35.50 249 8/23/2017 Dynah Haubert Confer w/ SL re consent decree, conference 0.1 0.1 $ 200 $ 20.00 250 8/23/2017 Dynah Haubert Teleconference w/ OC and Judge Hey re: consent decree & fees 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 251 8/23/2017 Dynah Haubert review new info and exhibits from 2401 defs 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 15 252 8/24/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft email to OC re CD edits, parking lot, and fees, incl. calculating fees to date 1.1 1.1 $ 200 $ 220.00 253 8/24/2017 Dynah Haubert Edits to CD per latest evidence from 2401; gather corresponding exhibits 0.8 0.8 $ 200 $ 160.00 254 8/25/2017 Dynah Haubert Research re parking lot pedestrian route designation .2; email SL re sharing CD with defendants .3 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 255 8/28/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ DMcComb and C. Block re CD changes .3; TC w/ OC and Judge Hey re status of negotiations .2, TC w/ Judge Hey at her request re: CD and fees .1; write notes to file re calls .2 0.8 0.8 $ 200 $ 160.00 256 8/29/2017 Dynah Haubert Email R. Thomas re invoice and fees for future review .2; email SL re same.1 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 257 8/30/2017 Dynah Haubert Review 2401 new exhibits and edits to CD and research in ADA standards re same; email OC re same 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 258 8/30/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ expert R Thomas re invoice 0.1 0.1 $ 200 $ 20.00 259 8/30/2017 Dynah Haubert Meet w/ SL re remaining issues on CD and fees 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 260 8/30/2017 Shanon Levin Confer w/ DH re remaining issues 0.3 0.3 $ 355 $ 106.50 261 8/31/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft email to OC re their CD edits; confer w/ SL re same 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 262 8/31/2017 Dynah Haubert Review and accept as applicable 2401's redlines to CD; ensure correct updated set of exhibits 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 263 8/31/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re settlement 0.1 0.1 $ 355 $ 35.50 264 9/19/2017 Dynah Haubert Review latest correspondence; discuss same w/ SL (.1); email OC re status 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 265 9/21/2017 Dynah Haubert Draft email to Judge Hey re: case status, requesting conference 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 266 9/21/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ OC re "ADA standards" provision in CD 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 267 9/28/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ OC and C Block before MJ Hey 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 268 9/29/2017 Dynah Haubert Update SL on call w/ Judge Hey 0.1 0.1 $ 200 $ 20.00 269 9/29/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re status and strategy 0.1 0.1 $ 355 $ 35.50 270 10/2/2017 Dynah Haubert Review CD and fee info for call w/ Judge Hey, incl. calculating latest fees 0.6 0.6 $ 200 $ 120.00 271 10/3/2017 Dynah Haubert Meet w/ SL to prep for call .2; TC w/ Judge Hey at her request, .3 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 272 10/3/2017 Shanon Levin Confer w/ DHaubert re strategy; t/c w/ Judge Hey 0.5 0.5 $ 355 $ 177.50 273 10/6/2017 Shanon Levin Confer w/ DHaubert re settlement 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 274 10/6/2017 Dynah Haubert TC from Judge Hey re 2401 proposal on CD & fees, .1; confer w/ SL re same, .2 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 275 10/10/2017 Shanon Levin Confer w/ DHaubert re response to 2401 proposal 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 276 10/10/2017 Dynah Haubert Meet w/ SL re response to Judge Hey 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 277 10/10/2017 Shanon Levin Research re attorney fee awards 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 278 10/11/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ A Goldstein re: conference and her client's agreement with 2401, .1; confer w/ SL re response to Judge Hey, .1; draft email response to Judge Hey, .3 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 279 10/11/2017 Dynah Haubert Review mgmt agreement btwn Garces Rest. Group and 2401, and letter re same from A Goldstein 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 Discovery Related 280 10/11/2017 Dynah Haubert LVM for client asking to CB re case update 0.1 0.1 $ 200 $ 20.00 281 10/11/2017 Shanon Levin Confer w/ DHaubert re strategy; review and revise email to Judge Hey 0.6 0.6 $ 355 $ 213.00 282 10/12/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ client re case updates 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 283 10/12/2017 Dynah Haubert TC from Judge Hey re 2401's response re CD 0.1 0.1 $ 200 $ 20.00 284 10/12/2017 Dynah Haubert Email to client re CD language 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 285 10/12/2017 Shanon Levin Review notes of conversation w/ client and Judge Hey; review and revise draft email 0.3 0.3 $ 355 $ 106.50 286 10/13/2017 Dynah Haubert Meet w/ SL re strategy 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 287 10/13/2017 Shanon Levin Review email correspondence; meet w/ DHaubert re strategy 0.5 0.5 $ 355 $ 177.50 16 288 10/16/2017 Dynah Haubert Review draft final CD from OC (.2), confer w/ SL re response (.2), draft language re fees & enforcement (.2) 0.6 0.6 $ 200 $ 120.00 289 10/16/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ Dave and C. Block re overhead sign 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 290 10/16/2017 Dynah Haubert Confer w/ SL re overhead sign 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 291 10/16/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re status and strategy; review Defs' Consent Decree and prepare Consent Decree language 2 2 $ 355 $ 710.00 292 10/16/2017 Shanon Levin Review email correspondence; prepare for conference; prepare email correspondence to opposing counsel and judge 1.7 1.7 $ 355 $ 603.50 293 10/17/2017 Dynah Haubert Attend status teleconference w/ OC and Judge Pappert 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 294 10/18/2017 Dynah Haubert Per D. McComb's request, edited consent decree formatting and verified correct identification of exhibits 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 295 10/17/2017 Shanon Levin Confer w/ DHaubert re status and strategy 0.4 0.4 $ 355 $ 142.00 296 10/17/2017 Dynah Haubert Meet w/ SL re case status, strategy 0.4 0.4 $ 200 $ 80.00 297 10/17/2017 Shanon Levin T/C w/ defense counsel 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 298 10/20/2017 Dynah Haubert TC w/ client re signing consent decree, timeline for modifications 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 299 10/23/2017 Dynah Haubert Per Mr. McComb's request, put together counterparts and email executed CD and exhibits to Judge Pappert 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 300 10/30/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ Dhaubert re fee offer 0.1 0.1 $ 355 $ 35.50 301 10/30/2017 Dynah Haubert Email to OC re fee offer, confer w/ SL re same (.1) 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 302 11/2/2017 Dynah Haubert Prepare DRP form for payment of invoice for R. Thomas's review of planned modifications 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 303 12/14/2017 Shanon Levin Review and comment on Status Report 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 304 12/18/2017 Dynah Haubert Review DMccomb's status letter (.2); attend status conference (.2); meet w/ SL re status conference (.2) 0.6 0.6 $ 200 $ 120.00 305 12/18/2017 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re t/c w/ judge 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 306 12/22/2017 Dynah Haubert Review add'l photos from DMccomb (.2); emails re scheduling inspection w/architect and M Leahy (.3) 0.5 0.5 $ 200 $ 100.00 307 1/3/2018 Dynah Haubert Begin to draft fee motion 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 308 1/4/2018 Dynah Haubert Research & draft fee motion (.7); email w/ client re inspection (.1) 0.8 0.8 $ 200 $ 160.00 309 1/8/2018 Dynah Haubert TC w/ client to prep for site inspection 0.2 0.2 $ 200 $ 40.00 310 1/10/2018 Dynah Haubert Prepare for site inspection (review pictures/plans of modifications to be inspected and gather necessary materials and tools) 0.6 0.6 $ 200 $ 120.00 311 1/10/2018 Dynah Haubert Site inspection (including .6 travel b/w DRP office and site) 1.5 1.5 $ 200 $ 300.00 312 1/11/2018 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re inspection 0.2 0.2 $ 355 $ 71.00 313 1/11/2018 Dynah Haubert Review results of site inspection (.5); review items with SLevin (.2); TC w/ client re issues to be reported to defs. (.1); email w/ RThomas re issues (.1); email OC re outstanding issues 1 1 $ 200 $ 200.00 314 1/16/2018 Dynah Haubert Email w/ DMccomb re CD compliance issues and review issues w/ RResnick 0.3 0.3 $ 200 $ 60.00 315 1/17/2018 Dynah Haubert Confer w/ SLevin re case updates 0.1 0.1 $ 200 $ 20.00 316 1/16/2018 Dynah Haubert Draft fee order 1 1 $ 200 $ 200.00 317 1/17/2018 Dynah Haubert Draft fee order and sections of fee petition 3.3 3.3 $ 200 $ 660.00 318 1/17/2018 Shanon Levin Meet w/ DHaubert re inspection 0.1 0.1 $ 355 $ 35.50 319 1/18/2018 Dynah Haubert Draft sections of fee petition 4.3 4.3 $ 200 $ 860.00 320 1/19/2018 Dynah Haubert Draft sections of fee petition 1.9 1.9 $ 200 $ 380.00 321 1/21/2018 Dynah Haubert Corr. w. expert re invoice (.1); draft sections of fee petition (1.5) 1.6 1.6 $ 200 $ 320.00 322 1/22/2018 Dynah Haubert Draft & edit sections of fee petition (2.1); identify exhibits to brief (.5); calculate fees to date (.4) 3 3 $ 200 $ 600.00 17 323 1/23/2018 Dynah Haubert Draft Haubert declaration for fee petition 1.1 1.1 $ 200 $ 220.00 324 1/24/2018 Dynah Haubert Draft Darr declaration for fee petition 0.7 0.7 $ 200 $ 140.00 325 1/24/2018 Kelly Darr Review itemized fees and exercise billing judgment 0.4 0.4 $ 355 $ 142.00 326 1/29/2018 Dynah Haubert Edit fee brief, declarations, exhibits 2.3 2.3 $ 200 $ 460.00 Total Reasonable Attorneys' Hours / Fees 216.5 181.3 $ 43,203.00