From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leach v. Gary

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 5, 1976
54 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

October 5, 1976


In an action inter alia to determine the location of a common boundary line of certain real property pursuant to article 15 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, the plaintiffs appeal (1) as limited by their notice of appeal and brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 26, 1976, as, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the first cause of action of their complaint for failure to join the State of New York and the Town of Oyster Bay as parties defendant and (2) from an order of the same court, entered January 21, 1976, which was made on their motion pursuant to CPLR 4404. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from and order affirmed, with one bill of costs to cover both appeals. The record on this appeal indicates that the State of New York and the Town of Oyster Bay may have an interest in the disputed land, which is located between the parties' properties. Consequently, title to that land and the determination of a common boundary line cannot be established without a joinder of both entities. Such joinder would be in accordance with the directives of CPLR 1001 (subd [a]) and section 1511 (subd 2) of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law. Martuscello, Acting P.J., Latham, Cohalan, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Leach v. Gary

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 5, 1976
54 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Leach v. Gary

Case Details

Full title:PAUL J. LEACH, Appellant, v. HERBERT GARY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 5, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Teeple Farms, Inc. v. LaValley

The record also indicates that there are property owners holding title to lands immediately to the east who…

Fila v. Angiolillo

If the road were to be declared a town highway, the town would be responsible for its maintenance and repair.…