Opinion
3:21-cv-00237-MMD-CLB
12-28-2022
HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC Jason D. Guinasso Todd W. Prall HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC Peccole Professional Park Attorneys for Defendant CF USA, Inc. and Counterclaimants CF USA, Inc. and CF Global Holdings, Inc HALL PRANGLE & SCHOONVELD, LLC Mari K. Schaan, Esq. Nathan R. Reinmiller, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff
HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC
Jason D. Guinasso
Todd W. Prall
HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC
Peccole Professional Park
Attorneys for Defendant CF USA, Inc. and Counterclaimants CF USA, Inc. and CF Global Holdings, Inc
HALL PRANGLE & SCHOONVELD, LLC
Mari K. Schaan, Esq.
Nathan R. Reinmiller, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF LEACH LOGISTIS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT CF USA, INC'S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF 90)
(HEARING REQUESTED)
Defendant/Counter-Claimant CF USA, Inc., a Delaware limited liability company (“Defendant” or “CF USA”), by and through its counsel of record and Plaintiff LEACH LOGISTICS, INC., by and through its counsel of record hereby stipulate and agree, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Civil Local Rule IA 6-1, to extend the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff Leach Logistics' Opposition to Defendant Cf USA, Inc's Motion To Dismiss (ECF 90) to January 4, 2023. This Stipulation is based on the following:
1. Due to the current workload of Defendant's attorneys and the upcoming holiday, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline one week for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff Leach Logistics' Opposition to Defendant Cf USA, Inc's Motion to Dismiss (ECF 90). Therefore, the Parties stipulate and agree that Defendant should have through and including January 4, 2023, in which to respond Plaintiff Leach Logistics' Opposition to Defendant Cf USA, Inc's Motion To Dismiss (ECF 90).
2. This Stipulation is made in good faith and is not for the purpose of delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED