From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LE CHASE v. LA MAR

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 16, 2000
273 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

June 16, 2000.

Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Lunn, J. — Negligence.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P. J., GREEN, KEHOE AND LAWTON, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendants' contention that Supreme Court erred in this action for dental malpractice in including only one theory of negligence in the verdict sheet submitted to the jury. Although plaintiffs' expert testified concerning more than one deviation from the level of care acceptable in the professional community in which defendant Frank LaMar, D.D.S. practices ( see generally, Schrempf v. State of New York, 66 N.Y.2d 289, 295), plaintiffs relied upon the sole theory that the lack of aggressive postoperative treatment of a fistula caused the injuries sustained by plaintiff Raymond R. LeChase. Thus, the court properly limited both the jury charge and the verdict sheet to that theory.


Summaries of

LE CHASE v. LA MAR

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 16, 2000
273 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

LE CHASE v. LA MAR

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND R. LE CHASE AND GLORIA LE CHASE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. FRANK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 16, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
710 N.Y.S.2d 290