From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

L.D.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 5, 1998
711 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-1782

Opinion filed June 5, 1998 JANUARY TERM 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Gene R. Stephenson, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Rebecca M. Becker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kelli R. Orndorff, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


L.D.H. appeals a delinquency adjudication and order of commitment, after a plea of no contest in one case and a trial in another. L.D.H. was not represented by counsel in either case and nothing in the record reflects a waiver of counsel or a thorough inquiry into appellant's desire to waive counsel. The trial court asked if appellant was represented by counsel, and his parents responded that they had filed financial affidavits but the court had determined that they did not qualify for the Public Defender. Nothing further appears in the record to indicate a waiver, contrary to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.165. Reversal is thus required. See N.R.L. v. State, 684 So.2d 299 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); In the Interest of D.L.A., 667 So.2d 330 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

This seems strange in view of the fact that the Public Defender was appointed for purposes of appeal, yet nothing in the record indicates a change in the parents' financial circumstances.

REVERSED.

PETERSON and ANTOON, J.J., concur.


Summaries of

L.D.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 5, 1998
711 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

L.D.H. v. State

Case Details

Full title:L.D.H., a child, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 5, 1998

Citations

711 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

B.P. v. State

The State concedes that the trial court failed to follow the dictates of Rule 8.165 and that this court has…