From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lazzio v. Primo Silk Company, Incorporated

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 9, 1935
181 A. 44 (N.J. 1935)

Opinion

Submitted May 31, 1935 —

Decided October 9, 1935.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 114 N.J.L. 450.

For the respondent, Isadore Rabinowitz.

For the appellant, Cox Walburg.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Lazzio v. Primo Silk Company, Incorporated

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 9, 1935
181 A. 44 (N.J. 1935)
Case details for

Lazzio v. Primo Silk Company, Incorporated

Case Details

Full title:GLADYS LAZZIO, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSQUENDUM, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. PRIMO…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 9, 1935

Citations

181 A. 44 (N.J. 1935)
115 N.J.L. 506