From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lazzaro v. Kelly

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 1, 1982
439 N.E.2d 868 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided July 1, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, RUDOLPH U. JOHNSON, J.

Mitchell T. Williams for appellants.

Philip O'Shea, Jr., for respondents.


On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 87 A.D.2d 975). Service as an escrow agent does not provide a basis for invocation of the continuous representation doctrine.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER. Taking no part: Judge GABRIELLI.


Summaries of

Lazzaro v. Kelly

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 1, 1982
439 N.E.2d 868 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Lazzaro v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP LAZZARO et al., Appellants, v. THOMAS J. KELLY et al., Respondents…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 1, 1982

Citations

439 N.E.2d 868 (N.Y. 1982)
439 N.E.2d 868
454 N.Y.S.2d 59

Citing Cases

Walter, Inc. v. Sarkisian Bros

We turn next to the question of whether Special Term correctly denied defendants' cross motion for summary…

Town of Amherst v. Weiss

There is likewise no dispute that the Town Board discussed that letter. The Town, however, neither consulted…