From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lazar v. Goldfarb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 12, 1947
273 App. Div. 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

December 12, 1947.


Appeal from Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department.


The trial court improperly dismissed the complaint at the close of the plaintiff's case; the plaintiff was not guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law. The error thus committed was not cured by the subsequent proceedings in connection with the defendant's counterclaim. The determination of the Appellate Term and the judgment and the order of the Municipal Court, insofar as they dismiss the plaintiff-appellant's complaint, should be reversed and a new trial ordered thereof, with costs in all courts to the appellant to abide the event.

Peck, P.J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Determination of the Appellate Term and the judgment and the order of the Municipal Court, insofar as they dismiss the plaintiff-appellant's complaint, unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered thereof, with costs in all courts to the appellant to abide the event. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Lazar v. Goldfarb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 12, 1947
273 App. Div. 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

Lazar v. Goldfarb

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL LAZAR, Plaintiff, and HUB TOWEL SUPPLY CORP., Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 12, 1947

Citations

273 App. Div. 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)