From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lazar v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 15, 2022
21 Civ. 1748 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2022)

Opinion

21 Civ. 1748 (LGS)

09-15-2022

SORIN LAZAR, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WHEREAS, on September 30, 2021, Plaintiff filed the Second Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, the Opinion and Order dated July 26, 2022, dismissed the Second Amended Complaint as to Defendants Cyris Jewels and The Aurora Condominium. The Plaintiff was permitted to seek leave to replead consistent with the Opinion by filing a red-lined version of the proposed Third Amended Complaint, showing changes from the Second Amended Complaint, together with a letter application explaining how the proposed amended pleading cures the deficiencies identified in the Opinion;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the proposed Third Amended Complaint and letter application on August 17, 2022. It is hereby

ORDERED that Defendants City of New York and Nunezramos shall raise any objection to the addition of the malicious prosecution claim by September 20, 2022.


Summaries of

Lazar v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 15, 2022
21 Civ. 1748 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Lazar v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:SORIN LAZAR, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 15, 2022

Citations

21 Civ. 1748 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2022)