From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Layton v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Apr 25, 2014
137 So. 3d 384 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

Nos. 2D12–5454 2D13–0277.

2014-04-25

Tiffany LAYTON and G. Penfield Jennings, as Co–Personal Representatives of the Estate of Julia Hicks, for the use and benefit of said Estate, Kathryn Metz, a minor, by and through her father and natural guardian William Metz, William Metz, Jr., a minor by and through his father and natural guardian William Metz, Tiffany Layton, individually and Sean Metz, individually, Appellants, v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, Appellee.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Charles E. Bergmann, Judge. Amy S. Farrior and Raymond T. Elligett, Jr. of Buell & Elligett, P.A., Tampa; and David L. Deehl and Susan Carlson of Deehl & Carlson, P.A., Miami, for Appellants. Edward W. Gerecke, Joseph H. Lang, Jr., and David J. Walz of Carlton Fields, P.A., Tampa; and Robert B. Friedman and Heather M. Howard of King & Spalding, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.



Summaries of

Layton v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Apr 25, 2014
137 So. 3d 384 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Layton v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Tiffany LAYTON and G. Penfield Jennings, as Co–Personal Representatives of…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Apr 25, 2014

Citations

137 So. 3d 384 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)