From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Layton v. Knipp

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 10, 2013
2:13-cv-1618 AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2013)

Opinion


TIMOTHY PAUL LAYTON, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM B. KNIPP, Defendant. No. 2:13-cv-1618 AC P United States District Court, E.D. California. December 10, 2013

          ORDER

          ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

         By order filed September 23, 2013, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court's order.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Layton v. Knipp

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 10, 2013
2:13-cv-1618 AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Layton v. Knipp

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY PAUL LAYTON, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM B. KNIPP, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 10, 2013

Citations

2:13-cv-1618 AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2013)