From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Layne Christensen Co. v. Bro-Tech Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 30, 2012
2012-1178 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 30, 2012)

Opinion

2012-1178

07-30-2012

LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY AND ARUP K. SENGUPTA, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BRO-TECH CORPORATION (DOING BUSINESS AS THE PUROLITE COMPANY), Defendant-Appellant.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in case no. 09-CV-2381, Senior Judge John W. Lungstrum.

ON MOTION


ORDER

Upon consideration of Bro-Tech Corporation's notification that the district court amended its final judgment on June 29, 2012,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The stay of the briefing schedule is lifted.

(2) Bro-Tech Corporation's opening brief is due no later than 60 days following the date of this order.

FOR THE COURT

_________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
cc: Patrick D. Kuehl, Jr., Esq.

David R. Francescani, Esq.
s25


Summaries of

Layne Christensen Co. v. Bro-Tech Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 30, 2012
2012-1178 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Layne Christensen Co. v. Bro-Tech Corp.

Case Details

Full title:LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY AND ARUP K. SENGUPTA, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jul 30, 2012

Citations

2012-1178 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 30, 2012)